[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2006-09-10 Thread Martin Aspeli
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10 Sep 2006, at 14:53, Rocky Burt wrote: This sounds fine, but we'd probably want to wait until we have a CMF version that does require 2.10, right? HEAD says Zope >= 2.9. Unless we want to work with indirections that know

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2006-09-10 Thread Martin Aspeli
Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rocky Burt wrote: On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 21:57 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi guys, philiKON pointed out something interesting to me the other day - we could actually register the existing tools as local utilities as of Zope 2.

[Zope-CMF] Re: CMF 2.1 release schedule

2006-09-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > > I was under the impression there were a few "show-stoppers" that needed > CMF 2.1 (and in some cases Five) support that weren't there yet, like > the "customize a skin item". Are there any items you know are missing? > You seem to apply you have everything you need.

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2006-09-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, which dependencies does Plone 3.0 have that > require Zope 2.10? Or was it some papal edict to use 2.10? It was more of an edict, to catch up with the latest versions of our underlying frameworks again. The two things we are actually relying

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2006-09-10 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rocky Burt wrote: > On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 21:57 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> philiKON pointed out something interesting to me the other day - we >> could actually register the existing tools as local utilities as of Zope >> 2.10. Tha

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2006-09-10 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10 Sep 2006, at 14:53, Rocky Burt wrote: This sounds fine, but we'd probably want to wait until we have a CMF version that does require 2.10, right? HEAD says Zope >= 2.9. Unless we want to work with indirections that know how to do the right t

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2006-09-10 Thread Rocky Burt
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 21:57 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote: > Hi guys, > > philiKON pointed out something interesting to me the other day - we > could actually register the existing tools as local utilities as of Zope > 2.10. That way, you could do this: > >actions = getUtility(IActionsTool) >

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2006-09-10 Thread Rocky Burt
On Sun, 2006-10-09 at 12:57 +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > On 9 Sep 2006, at 22:57, Martin Aspeli wrote: > > > philiKON pointed out something interesting to me the other day - we > > could actually register the existing tools as local utilities as of > > Zope 2.10. That way, you could do this:

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF 2.1 release schedule

2006-09-10 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9 Sep 2006, at 15:57, Wichert Akkerman wrote: Plone 3.0 is slowly making progress and I would like to make a first alpha release in 3-4 weeks. That release will be quite rough, but will showcase the new technology. A big part of that will hopeful

Re: [Zope-CMF] Tools as local utilities

2006-09-10 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9 Sep 2006, at 22:57, Martin Aspeli wrote: philiKON pointed out something interesting to me the other day - we could actually register the existing tools as local utilities as of Zope 2.10. That way, you could do this: This sounds fine, but

[Zope-CMF] CMF Collector: Open Issues

2006-09-10 Thread tseaver
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector (http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF). Assigned and Open jens - "CachingPolicyManager: Support OFS.Cache.CacheManager", [Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/408 mhammond - "Windows Developm