Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10 Sep 2006, at 14:53, Rocky Burt wrote:
This sounds fine, but we'd probably want to wait until we have a CMF
version that does require 2.10, right? HEAD says Zope >= 2.9. Unless
we want to work with indirections that know
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rocky Burt wrote:
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 21:57 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi guys,
philiKON pointed out something interesting to me the other day - we
could actually register the existing tools as local utilities as of Zope
2.
Hi.
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>
> I was under the impression there were a few "show-stoppers" that needed
> CMF 2.1 (and in some cases Five) support that weren't there yet, like
> the "customize a skin item". Are there any items you know are missing?
> You seem to apply you have everything you need.
Hi.
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity, which dependencies does Plone 3.0 have that
> require Zope 2.10? Or was it some papal edict to use 2.10?
It was more of an edict, to catch up with the latest versions of our
underlying frameworks again.
The two things we are actually relying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rocky Burt wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 21:57 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> philiKON pointed out something interesting to me the other day - we
>> could actually register the existing tools as local utilities as of Zope
>> 2.10. Tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10 Sep 2006, at 14:53, Rocky Burt wrote:
This sounds fine, but we'd probably want to wait until we have a CMF
version that does require 2.10, right? HEAD says Zope >= 2.9. Unless
we want to work with indirections that know how to do the right
t
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 21:57 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> philiKON pointed out something interesting to me the other day - we
> could actually register the existing tools as local utilities as of Zope
> 2.10. That way, you could do this:
>
>actions = getUtility(IActionsTool)
>
On Sun, 2006-10-09 at 12:57 +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> On 9 Sep 2006, at 22:57, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>
> > philiKON pointed out something interesting to me the other day - we
> > could actually register the existing tools as local utilities as of
> > Zope 2.10. That way, you could do this:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9 Sep 2006, at 15:57, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Plone 3.0 is slowly making progress and I would like to make a first
alpha release in 3-4 weeks. That release will be quite rough, but will
showcase the new technology. A big part of that will hopeful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9 Sep 2006, at 22:57, Martin Aspeli wrote:
philiKON pointed out something interesting to me the other day - we
could actually register the existing tools as local utilities as of
Zope 2.10. That way, you could do this:
This sounds fine, but
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
jens
- "CachingPolicyManager: Support OFS.Cache.CacheManager",
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/408
mhammond
- "Windows Developm
11 matches
Mail list logo