Alexander Limi wrote:
Florent Guillaume:
That's been the intent of the code all along: when you query the
workflow tool and ask it for the state of an object, this is passed
along to DCWorkflow, and if the object doesn't have a state anymore
the initial state is returned.
However if you r
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:07:07 +0100, Florent Guillaume
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Objects which have a no-longer-sane review_state have *never* had
reasonable behavior: the workflow engine *can't* compute what to do
with them. They have no transitions (which is why the wor
Raphael Ritz wrote:
Objects which have a no-longer-sane review_state have *never* had
reasonable behavior: the workflow engine *can't* compute what to do
with them. They have no transitions (which is why the workflow actions
are gone), and they can't be fixed by the "Update Security" button,
be
Tres Seaver wrote:
[..]
Objects which have a no-longer-sane review_state have *never* had
reasonable behavior: the workflow engine *can't* compute what to do
with them. They have no transitions (which is why the workflow actions
are gone), and they can't be fixed by the "Update Security" butt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Limi wrote:
> Can anybody familiar with DCWorkflow take a look at this?
>
> http://trac.plone.org/plone/ticket/5067
>
> It used to work, and is a classic workflow change operation that I
> personally use all the time.
>
Objects which hav
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:27:48 +0100, Florent Guillaume
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexander Limi wrote:
Can anybody familiar with DCWorkflow take a look at this?
http://trac.plone.org/plone/ticket/5067
It used to work, and is a classic workflow change operation that I
personally use all t
Alexander Limi wrote:
Can anybody familiar with DCWorkflow take a look at this?
http://trac.plone.org/plone/ticket/5067
It used to work, and is a classic workflow change operation that I
personally use all the time.
CMF doesn't have a "workflow pulldown", and has probably different ways of
