yuppie y.2015@... writes:
yuppie wrote:
There is no test that shows what was broken and fixed. AFAICS there is
nothing wrong with using None for uninitialized objects. We just have a
new requirement in Products.ZCatalog 3: Attributes with None values can
no longer be indexed.
Tres Seaver tseaver@... writes:
On 03/04/2013 06:46 AM, Maurits van Rees wrote:
If that commit helps, then some test errors will show up in
Products.CMFDefault, mostly this:
TypeError: Object has default comparison
New BTrees expects objects used as keys to have real comparison
Maurits van Rees m.van.rees@... writes:
I have added a missing pin for z3c.recipe.scripts (1.0.1), which should
help there.
I'm surprised you found that pin missing. I thought I had removed all use
of that recipe from the CMF trunk builout, as it isn't compatible with
buildout 2 yet.
But
Patrick Gerken patrick.gerken@... writes:
are the missing CMF Tests only temporary or is there a need for a new source
of test reports?
I spoke to Stefan Holek and he no longer has the time nor interest to
maintain the Zope2 and CMF nightly tests. He's not working on any web
based projects
yuppie y.2013@... writes:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Does anyone have objections if I ask him to convert the CMF packages?
Yes. I have objections.
I'd like to keep contributing to CMF. But I'm not going to support
GitHub Inc. by using its services.
Ok. I thought this might
Hi.
Stephan Richter has volunteered to do SVN to Github conversions for all Zope
projects and has already completed all of Zope 2 core and some actively used
projects like five.localsitemanager.
Does anyone have objections if I ask him to convert the CMF packages?
And if Tres reads this:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:14 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
My checkin for Products.ZCatalog has an optional dependency on
five.globalrequest. If five.globalrequest is not installed,
Products.ZCatalog behaves exactly as before. I hope we don't need a
Products.ZCatalog 2.14 release
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:19 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
But an additional ZCatalog branch is an additional maintenance burden.
And the required change is small and 100% backwards compatible. The
zope.globalrequest dependency could be made optional.
Do we really need an extra
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
After the wrapping, the discussion item has the wrong path. Even though
self, the talkback object, has the correct path when calling
getPhysicalPath on it. I can't see anything overly stupid in the
DiscussionItem code,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 21:10 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I tracked this down to a missing aq_inner call in the new
getPhysicalPath and fixed that.
Thanks for taking the time, Hanno. I wouldn't have been able to figure than
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Hanno, have you got any stats on the optimisation? I looked briefly at the
changes and I'm not sure if this is really worth it.
Nikolay is working on this and some more evil looking patches at
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 05.07.2011, 07:00 Uhr, schrieb CMF tests summarizer nore...@zope.org:
[1] UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=1, errors=4) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk
Python-2.6.6 : Linux
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Godefroid Chapelle
got...@bubblenet.be wrote:
I had made changes to GS registries (use ZCA instead of own registries)
which got released in 1.6.3.
I backported those changes to 1.4.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Suresh V. suresh...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5603459/genericsetup-what-does-toolset-xml-accomplish-if-toolinit-still-has-to-be-called
As Jens pointed out, the CMF developers don't use stackoverflow as a
support channel. But your question
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
IMHO it's not a metter of how popular a given tool is. It's a matter of
where the developers/supporters hang out and what channels they use for
accepting questions, bug reports or support requests. For the CMF that
means
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
You really want to use the ZCA for every occurance of a string-object
mapping? Really?
As long as Zope doesn't have a central configuration registry like
Pyramid has, it unfortunately makes sense. It's massive overkill
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
If someone knows a better way to detect NTFS, please let me know.
I looked for better ways, but there's nothing good in default Python or pywin32.
The only real approach seems to involve calling the external diskpart
command
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
'container' is supposed to be the folder which holds the script /
template, not the context. In a CMF site, that will typically be the
site root, given the way items in skin layers appear to be direct
attributes of the
Hi Charlie,
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
2010-07-11 19:23:38 ERROR Application Couldn't install BTreeFolder2
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
stat_info = os.stat(path)
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:24 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Bringing up that question again certainly doesn't do any harm. I
personally have no objections to using relative SVN URLs.
I don't plan to bring it up again on Zope-dev. I just proposed to make
an
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I'm +0 on making this change: I don't konw who will be using this
buildout via an anonymous HTTP URL, but if everybody working on CMF is
alraedy using SVN = 1.5, I can't see any harm in the relative externals.
I've gone
2010/3/31 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com:
I believe the root of this problem is that the 'index' and 'versions'
bits of a buildout.cfg are effectively Highlanders (there can only be
one). I gave up on trying to get the two, two, two Zopes in one
buildout to work, and instead created a
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
OK, the change I'm planning on the trunk essentially reverts your last
commit (all the extra version pins to make the 'test-zope212' part
build), plus deleting the test-zope212 part (see attached patch).
Sure. That
Hi.
2010/1/23 Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com:
I am currently in trouble with the imports of a particular Plone
product (CMFBibliographyAT).
I'm pretty sure I've helped Martin to fix this in a branch for
CMFBibliographyAT. Martin, did you check in your work from the last
Tune-Up?
What happened
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
In the debugger I see that the object in question is a absolute_url
adapter residing in the base component registry in the site root. IMHO
the components exporter should not look at the base registry at all,
only a local
Hi.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Yvo Schubbe y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Log message for revision 107108:
- fixed Zope 2.12 compatibility
Just to make this explicit: CMF trunk should continue to run with Zope
2.12 and not only with 2.13, correct? If so, I'll add a second test
runner to
26 matches
Mail list logo
