This is the summary for test reports received on the
cmf-tests list between 2013-03-03 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-03-04 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/z
yuppie writes:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> > Does anyone have objections if I ask him to convert the CMF packages?
>
> Yes. I have objections.
>
> I'd like to keep contributing to CMF. But I'm not going to support
> GitHub Inc. by using its services.
Ok. I thought this might be controversial
Patrick Gerken writes:
> are the missing CMF Tests only temporary or is there a need for a new source
of test reports?
I spoke to Stefan Holek and he no longer has the time nor interest to
maintain the Zope2 and CMF nightly tests. He's not working on any web
based projects anymore, so this is qu
Maurits van Rees writes:
> I have added a missing pin for z3c.recipe.scripts (1.0.1), which should
> help there.
I'm surprised you found that pin missing. I thought I had removed all use
of that recipe from the CMF trunk builout, as it isn't compatible with
buildout 2 yet.
But maybe it's too am
Tres Seaver writes:
> On 03/04/2013 06:46 AM, Maurits van Rees wrote:
>
> > If that commit helps, then some test errors will show up in
> > Products.CMFDefault, mostly this:
> >
> > TypeError: Object has default comparison
>
> New BTrees expects objects used as keys to have "real" comparison
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2013 06:46 AM, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> If that commit helps, then some test errors will show up in
> Products.CMFDefault, mostly this:
>
> TypeError: Object has default comparison
New BTrees expects objects used as keys to have "real" co
Am 04.03.2013, 17:46 Uhr, schrieb Lennart Regebro :
On the contrary, it's state supported monopolies that are bad…
Monopolies of any sort are usually bad and, unfortunately, rarely
corrected by market forces. So much for "efficient market theory". Which
is why, since Standard Oil, we have
I'm not major a CMF contributor and are unlikely to actually
contribute much in the future, so I do not and should not have a say
in the move.
I'd just want to correct a factually incorrect statement though:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:55 AM, yuppie wrote:
> Monopolies are bad. (At least if they ar
Op 04-03-13 03:54, Patrick Gerken schreef:
Hi
,
are the missing CMF Tests only temporary or is there a need for a new
source of test reports?
I wonder if this is simply because bin/buildout failed to finish, though
I would still expect some output from the test bot then.
I have added a m
Am 02.03.2013, 22:44 Uhr, schrieb Tres Seaver :
The vote by foundation members to move to Github (rather than self-hosted
Git) was far from unanimous. In fact, we are supposed to have worked out
a means where folks could push to git.zope.org as the canonical
repository for some projects.
I wo
Hi!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I mean, there's no tangible cost (financial or otherwise) of using
GitHub; and git's architecture pretty much ensures that there's no
lock-in (especially if mirroring is set up).
[...]
I don't see it as supporting GitHub. I see it as using a service that is
free to us
11 matches
Mail list logo
