[Zope-CMF] Re: [DCWorkflow] condition on transition action

2005-06-28 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dieter Maurer wrote: > yuppie wrote at 2005-6-26 19:32 +0200: > >>... >>BTW: I'm not at all happy with the worklist Actions. > > > They are very useful. > > >>They are very >>expensive and specialized. > > > They can be made *MUCH* faster by us

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: [DCWorkflow] condition on transition action

2005-06-27 Thread Dieter Maurer
yuppie wrote at 2005-6-26 19:32 +0200: > ... >BTW: I'm not at all happy with the worklist Actions. They are very useful. >They are very >expensive and specialized. They can be made *MUCH* faster by using "ZCatalog.searchResults(catalog, ...)" rather than "catalog.searchResults(...)" when "catal

[Zope-CMF] Re: [DCWorkflow] condition on transition action

2005-06-26 Thread yuppie
Encolpe Degoute wrote: yuppie a écrit : | I think it's worth the effort to migrate DCWorkflow Actions to the | CMFCore Actions machinery for CMF 1.6. And in that context your | proposal is a move in the wrong direction. Now that actions machinery has been refactored in CMF 1.5, I would use th

[Zope-CMF] Re: [DCWorkflow] condition on transition action

2005-06-25 Thread Encolpe Degoute
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yuppie a écrit : | Hi! | | | Encolpe Degoute wrote: | |> Now that CMF 1.5 is out, and 1.5.1 too, can I start to work on |> this patch: http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/207 |> |> Have you any recommandations ? | | | Well. I'm not against a condition

[Zope-CMF] Re: [DCWorkflow] condition on transition action

2005-06-24 Thread yuppie
Hi! Encolpe Degoute wrote: Now that CMF 1.5 is out, and 1.5.1 too, can I start to work on this patch: http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/207 Have you any recommandations ? Well. I'm not against a condition field for workflow Actions. But I still can't see other than historical reasons to us