Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: CMF 1.5.1 release schedule

2005-04-16 Thread Gregoire Weber
Hi Tres, Hi All, I just saw that yesterday the plone people discussed the same stuff and I like to coordinate with them. They did an implementation yesterday on a branch. I'm quite sure I can't get this into 1.5.1 on time so let's look at it for 1.5.2. - PLIP:

Annotations in CMF, was: Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: CMF 1.5.1 release schedule

2005-04-14 Thread Gregoire Weber
Hi All, how about naming such annotation object the same as in Zope 3? (__annotations__) Does/did Five back port the annotation stuff of Zope3? I just like to avoid future incompatibilities. Gregoire Tres Seaver schrieb: CMFCore.CatalogTool already wraps the object in a special object, IndexableObj

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: CMF 1.5.1 release schedule

2005-04-14 Thread Gregoire Weber
yuppie schrieb: It does feel wrong that you have to register OpaqueItem attributes to make them work correctly. I'd rather like to see a solution similar to that for Zope 3 annotations: Storing all opaque items in one attribute. I agree with that in general with that. It would be more elegant! Do

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: CMF 1.5.1 release schedule

2005-04-11 Thread Florent Guillaume
yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For CMFSetup the "normal" rules are not suitable. CMFSetup is not as > mature as the other packages and we still have to change it in > fundamental ways. Though these changes might not always be fully > backwards compatible, I believe we should keep merging t