Am 15.09.2009, 21:53 Uhr, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl :
> You could pester those people who pointed out various things they wanted
> to have done before the release in the thread starting here:
that's me for one! I've nearly finished a formlib based folder-contents
view and hit a performance snag.
Hi,
it struck me the other day, that Zope 2.12 and eggs mean that we don't
have to keep the Products namespace. Has it been kept purely for
convenience? (It would be a lot of fairly monotonous editing to change) Or
is this an explicit Zope 2 convention for preserving the Products
namespace
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 13:42, Charlie Clark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it struck me the other day, that Zope 2.12 and eggs mean that we don't
> have to keep the Products namespace.
>
How come? Did I miss something?
Andreas
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zo
Am 24.09.2009, 13:43 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung :
> How come? Did I miss something?
Well - and it's more than likely that I'm mistaken! - eggs allow you to
define the namespace under which you can find them and for CMF we're
preserving "Products". And we've opted to keep the from Products.CMF.
Am 24.09.09 13:47, schrieb Charlie Clark:
> Am 24.09.2009, 13:43 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung :
>
>
>> How come? Did I miss something?
>>
> Well - and it's more than likely that I'm mistaken! - eggs allow you to
> define the namespace under which you can find them and for CMF we're
> prese
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Wed Sep 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Sep 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 4 messages: 4 from CMF Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Wed Sep 23 21:12:36 EDT 2009
URL: ht
Am 24.09.2009, 13:52 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung :
> In my understanding: packages using the Products namespace are subject
> to be registered during the startup phase of Zope (using their
> initialize()
> method). And I think there is some other evil path magic within Zope
> related to products i
On Sep 24, 2009, at 14:01 , Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 24.09.2009, 13:52 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung :
In my understanding: packages using the Products namespace are
subject
to be registered during the startup phase of Zope (using their
initialize()
method). And I think there is some other evil
Am 24.09.2009, 14:09 Uhr, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl :
> Renaming provides less than little perceived gain. It adds serious pain
> because then you must go about registering your package manually, you
> must change imports all over, and you force every package that depends
> on the CMF to do the
Charlie Clark, on 2009-09-24:
> Am 24.09.2009, 14:09 Uhr, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl :
>
>> Renaming provides less than little perceived gain. It adds serious pain
>> because then you must go about registering your package manually, you
>> must change imports all over, and you force every package t
On Sep 24, 2009, at 15:16 , Maurits van Rees wrote:
Personally, I am the maintainer of Products.Poi. It will take more
than one bottle of whisky to convince me to rename that. ;-)
Personally, I believe most product authors who have a real Zope 2
Product but chose a name other than "Product
On Sep 24, 2009, at 14:17 , Charlie Clark wrote:
Regarding something completely different - I picked up on zope-dev
that
the svn server has been updated. Does this mean that we can now use
the
svn branch to trunk merging offered in svn >= 1.5 or is this still
inadvisable? If it is still ina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to push out a beta for GS 1.5 today: any outstanding
issues or features nearly-ready-to-commit which should block that?
Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999
Tres Seaver wrote:
> I would like to push out a beta for GS 1.5 today: any outstanding
> issues or features nearly-ready-to-commit which should block that?
None I'm aware of.
But 2 things would be nice to have before a final release:
- A 2.0 release of five.localsitemanager. Some components
han
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> I would like to push out a beta for GS 1.5 today: any outstanding
>> issues or features nearly-ready-to-commit which should block that?
>
> None I'm aware of.
>
> But 2 things would be nice to have before a fina
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> yuppie wrote:
>> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> - A 2.0 release of five.localsitemanager. Some components
>> handler improvements in GenericSetup depend on 2.0dev.
>
> The trunk is actually the same as 2.0a1, modulo silly version bumps.
> Are there plan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hanno wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> yuppie wrote:
>>> Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> - A 2.0 release of five.localsitemanager. Some components
>>> handler improvements in GenericSetup depend on 2.0dev.
>> The trunk is actuall
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2009, at 15:16 , Maurits van Rees wrote:
>
>> Personally, I am the maintainer of Products.Poi. It will take more
>> than one bottle of whisky to convince me to rename that. ;-)
>
> Personally, I believe most product authors who have a real Zope 2
> Product bu
18 matches
Mail list logo
