Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu May 12 11:01:02 2005 UTC to Fri May 13 11:01:02 2005 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Unit Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.3.5 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Thu May 12 22:46:
--On Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2005 12:53 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
@Jim: what's your opinion on this subject?
Jim likes copies better than externals. If you can get him to explain
why, you should win a fabulous prize . But, regardless, you and
Brian (I think) are in charge o
[Andreas Jung]
> ...
> So for Zope 2.8 this means to me:
>
> - the ZConfig and zdaemon should have a minimal release management
> (means stable released should be tagged properly)
Definitely needed.
> - ZODB development can be done against any version
>
> - ZODB releases should done against a de
--On Freitag, 13. Mai 2005 9:07 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- the ZConfig and zdaemon should have a minimal release management
(means stable released should be tagged properly)
Definitely needed.
So let's do it. Amen. Tagging a package should not be so much overhead
for the
[Tim Peters]
>> The first time ZConfig and zdaemon get tagged, it's
>> important that whoever do that first search all
>> clients (ZODB and both Zopes) for changes to those
>> checked in from a wrong project, and do merges back
>> to ZConfig and zdaemon (I explained that dance last
>> time) -- else
