On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:38:16 +0100, Oliver Bleutgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Acquisition.ImplicitAcquirerWrapper: 42442
That class is used to glue together acquisition content chains. Being
top of the list indicates that you have been leaking an acquisition
context chain.
That doesnt mean
Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:38:16 +0100, Oliver Bleutgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Acquisition.ImplicitAcquirerWrapper: 42442
That class is used to glue together acquisition content chains. Being
top of the list indicates that you have been leaking an acquisition
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:37:00 +0100, Oliver Bleutgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- I did paste only the objects which have such a high count (next one
was approx 200).
Hmm. Ill have to ponder what that means.
- This server (2.3.3) has no special products on it, just 2 Folderish
ZClasses, which
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 05:08 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Matthew, thanks for taking the time to gdb the beast with me. Did you
come up with any instrumentation I should add to Python or Zope to get
what it is that Python is trying to resease twice? If you want, I can
Andre Schubert schrieb:
Andy McKay schrieb:
Didnt Shane do a leak finder product that can help debug this?
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh
I will install the LeakFinder product on the server and look what
happens
If have installed LeakFinder this morning and restarted zope.
Hello,
We also have the problem with zope crashing with segfault 11.
I've read al earlier posts on this subject, but couldn't notice anything
that could arrange a direct solution, or I should have missed something?
The only thing I can try is to describe our situation :
- We have a
One more question then I'll shut up ;-).
Toby Dickenson wrote:
Is there a description somewhere what the basic causes of such leakages
are? I.e. only bugs in python c-code/zope c-code?
No, its possible for a bug in through-the-web edited dtml to cause
this.
Waah, this is the first time
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:46:27 +0100, Oliver Bleutgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Waah, this is the first time I hear that. That means that even if
zope/python would be bug-free, it's possible to write dtml that causes a
leak?
Is there a (non-esoteric) example for that?
(untested, but the
The
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 10:05, Martijn Jacobs wrote:
[...]
I don't know where to start, because attaching GDB doesn't make any
sense, since you have to start zope single threaded (according to Matts
Stability Howto) and then no crashes occur.
Actually, at least in Linux, with a recent
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 09:09, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 05:08 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Matthew, thanks for taking the time to gdb the beast with me. Did you
come up with any instrumentation I should add to Python or Zope to get
what it is that
I'm curious as to what is holding up Zope 2.5.1? 2.5.1b1 has been out for
quite a while now (in Zope time).
--andy.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Well, I have the energy, I just don't know where to start. But it's
beginning to look like I'll just have to roll up my sleeves and dive in
C code to hunt this beast down. And to think that I'd chosen Python as
my official programming language to avoid just
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 13:03, Brian Lloyd wrote:
We are trying to get to the bottom of a few straggling
instability reports, so we're planning to go ahead with
a b2 as soon as we've either a) figured out and fixed them
b) figured them out and found it wasn't a Zope core problem
or c) decide
Actually, at least in Linux, with a recent gdb, you can attach gdb to
zope in multithread mode. Just take the -t 1 from the command line
sugested by the StabilityHOWTO and you're set. Best results are achieved
by compiling everything from source (python even, use the
Hello,
I am very new to Zope/DTML and I am a little confused with the operation of
the DTML-IN statement. Here is the snippet of code
table border=1 width=100%dtml-in
expr="( ((1), (1,2),(4,5,6),(7,8,9)) )"
tr
tddtml-var sequence-item/td
/tr/dtml-in/table
This code displays the
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 14:04, Brian Lloyd wrote:
The best way to help is to help get this (these) down to
a minimal, reproducable test case.
The problem is, as far as I could check, the crashes all happen inside
the gc, which runs orthogonal to the requests, so getting a
reproduceable test
Hi Gary,
This question is more suited to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and you should not send html e-mail to any of these
two lists, but since we are here...
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 16:13, Gary Yee wrote:
Hello,
I am very new to Zope/DTML and I am a little confused with
I set MALLOC_CHECK_ to 1 and it said it was using the malloc debug
hooks, but didn't report anything else before the crashes, so no point
in setting it to 2...
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 13:49, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 13:04, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 12:04, Brian Lloyd wrote:
- Absolutely eliminate SQL db access as a cause (it sounds
like we have proof of this now)
This sounds like it is not specific to any DA. Is that the case?
--
Andy Dustman PGP: 0x930B8AB6
@ .net
- Absolutely eliminate SQL db access as a cause (it sounds
like we have proof of this now)
This sounds like it is not specific to any DA. Is that the case?
The only one I know of is the MySQL DA, but what I was
getting at here was that eliminating ANY sql db access
lets us
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 21:30, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
On Wednesday, March 13, 2002, at 10:40 AM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
wrote:
What about patching Python to report the freed objects like you
mentioned on IRC? Also, how about turning on some flags in
gc.seg_debug()? Do you think we
21 matches
Mail list logo
