Hi,
I have a breadcrumbs python filesystem script. It's a long script that
constructs dictionaries and places them in a list for a master_template
to display. The dictionaries look like this
relative = context.portal_url.getRelativeContentPath(context)
code for various things ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
as it's possible to create an action icon with an empty icon expression, but
this action icon can never be edited again (a KeyError is raised), I propose
the attached patch against ActionIconsTool.py
After applying this patch, you can edit the
On Thursday 15 April 2004 17:11, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Anyway, I guess the tokenizer is
fine too, and might even be faster for all I know, just seems an
unfortunate duplication of work, plus I checked in importchecker for
little reason. :)
No, Fred was just a bit faster than me with
Jim Fulton wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
From: Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Initially, I propose to move just the repository heads. Maintenamce
branches (e.g. Zope 2.6 and Zope 2.7) will remain in CVS.
What is the rationale behind not moving it all?
- Reduce risk
- Provide a more gradual
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:03:32 +0200
Joachim Bauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
as it's possible to create an action icon with an empty icon
expression, but this action icon can never be edited again (a KeyError
is raised), I propose the
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
From: Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Initially, I propose to move just the repository heads. Maintenamce
branches (e.g. Zope 2.6 and Zope 2.7) will remain in CVS.
What is the rationale behind not moving it all?
- Reduce risk
-
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Making cookie authentication secure is surprisingly difficult, and you've
barely taken one step.
So how does PAS do cookie auth then?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Hmm. I really wasn't expecting any new code yet. Session cookies are a
very significant maintenance burden in Zope, and it's not in my interest
to support them. If you don't mind, I think I'll release a version of CC
without any session support, then I'll give Chris
Casey Duncan wrote:
1. manage_workspace is only protected by the Authenticated role, and
that is done directly, not even through a permission.
I think that is probably because this method is an abstraction for the
default managment screen. It does not know what the correct permission
is, but
Hi Chris,
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Chris McDonough wrote:
Great, I'm going to consider that a resounding endorsement and check it
in soon; please do let me know if you see anything odd come up.
If anyone else has been having issues with the old Transience module,
and would like to provide
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This discussion smells like that string should be computed from
introspection.
Why can't it be computed from introspecting whatever code called the log
method?
Well, first of all, how? __name__ should always be available, but that is
the name of the file
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 10:01, Chris Withers wrote:
This discussion smells like that string should be computed from introspection.
Why can't it be computed from introspecting whatever code called the log method?
You probably could do it via sys._getframe(). I'm not sure you should
though. ;)
Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Chris Withers wrote:
I wonder how many Plone users are aware their passwords are stored
unencrypted in client cookies which fly back and forth waiting to be
snapped up by packet sniffers, XSS, and JS attacks ;-)
Even with unbreakable encryption of
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Peter Sabaini wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Even with unbreakable encryption of credentials after login, you still
send the username and password in the clear at login time, and sniffers
can reuse the session ID with ease. You really shouldn't tell the Plone
users
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Hmm. I really wasn't expecting any new code yet. Session cookies are a
very significant maintenance burden in Zope, and it's not in my interest
to support them. If you don't mind, I think I'll release a version of CC
without any session support, then
Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Peter Sabaini wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Even with unbreakable encryption of credentials after login, you still
send the username and password in the clear at login time, and sniffers
can reuse the session ID with ease. You really shouldn't tell the
Is there any way to influence the order of transaction aborts when you
hijack the transaction mechanism in a similar way as
Shared/DC/ZRDB/TM.py does? I have Folder and File like classes which
make changes on the file system as a part of their operation. When
within a transaction I make multiple
Jim Fulton wrote:
Based on recent discussions, I've created a proposal:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/RenameTheZopePackage
to rename the zope package to z. Unless there are strong
objections, we'll do this after we move the Zope repository head to
subversion at the end of the month.
I've gotten
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:08:03PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| What do people think about alternative 4?
+1.
--
Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://awkly.org - dreamcatching :: making your dreams come true
http://plone.org/about/team#dreamcatcher
Debug is human, de-fix divine.
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 12:08, Jim Fulton wrote:
What do people think about alternative 4?
+1
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
+1
Jim Fulton wrote:
What do people think about alternative 4?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
Fred Drake wrote:
zLOG is dead
The zLOG package used for logging throughout ZODB, ZEO, and Zope 2 has
been declared obsolete. All logging for Zope products will use the
logging package from Python's standard library.
The zLOG package still exists in Zope 2 and the
Hi Fred,
there are currently two things confusing me:
- the entries in the event.log are currently written without the log level.
Is this dedicated
behaviour? I think the log level should be part of the event.log
- when adding
LOG = getLogger(...)
LOG.info(...)
to some modules then
+1
I had thought about exactly this idea during the weekend but I thought
the z alternative had such traction that it wasn't worth mentioning.
The only difference is that I thought about renaming Zope to ZopeClassic
or ZopeLegacy instead of Zope2 (keeping version numbers out of packages
and all
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:08:03PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
What do people think about alternative 4?
+1
Marius Gedminas
--
Q: How many IBM CPU's does it take to execute a job?
A: Four; three to hold it down, and one to rip its head off.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 15:46, Fred Drake wrote:
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 12:08 pm, Jim Fulton wrote:
What do people think about alternative 4?
+1
Okay, add me to the chorus: +1
-Barry
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did this ever get resolved?
I had similiar problem with a custom Product
extending Folder. Noticed when I commented the following lines of code,
the error went away:
#security.setDefaultAccess("deny") #__roles__ =
()
--
Thanks for
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 01:22 pm, Andreas Jung wrote:
- the entries in the event.log are currently written without the log
level. Is this dedicated
behaviour? I think the log level should be part of the event.log
It should. This was lost when I changed the zLOG -- logging mapping, and
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 01:15 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
Fred Drake wrote:
* Do I need to take care that the messages are logged into the event log
and on the console or can I safly use the logging package like::
...
zLOG has logged the messages to the console when zope was started with
I am making a big upgrade and moving my products from 2.3.1 on HP-UX
to 2.7.0 on windows 2000 and can't get zope to produce any tracebacks
when it encounters errors. I've checked all the log files and monitor
stdout
to no avail. All I get is a brief html message with error type and value
and
| I had thought about exactly this idea during the weekend but I thought
| the z alternative had such traction that it wasn't worth mentioning.
| The only difference is that I thought about renaming Zope to ZopeClassic
| or ZopeLegacy instead of Zope2 (keeping version numbers out of packages
| and
According to Mika, David P (Research):
I am making a big upgrade and moving my products from 2.3.1 on HP-UX
to 2.7.0 on windows 2000 and can't get zope to produce any tracebacks
when it encounters errors. I've checked all the log files and monitor
stdout
to no avail. All I get is a brief
shared/dc/zrdb/tm does not hijack the transaction mechanism it
integrates with it.
you should coalesce txn integration for your objects into a single txn
integrator so you needn't depend on transaction message/jar ordering.
-kapil
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 11:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there
33 matches
Mail list logo
