[Zope-dev] Re: RFC: The future of Products.Five

2006-10-29 Thread Rocky Burt
On Mon, 2006-30-10 at 00:01 +0100, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Proposal > > > So, what I'm proposing is to feature-freeze the Products.Five package > and just basically keep making it work for future Zope versions. Five > 1.6 (current trunk) will work for Zope 2.11 (current trunk

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope Tests: 8 OK, 1 Failed

2006-10-29 Thread yuppie
Hi! Andreas Jung wrote: --On 29. Oktober 2006 10:06:42 +0100 yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oops! Sorry! I did not mean to cause any confusion: - AFAICT the 2.10 branch points already to the 3.3.0 tag. Right. However Philipp pointed out that the Zope 2 trunk uses the Zope 3 trunk ri

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope Tests: 8 OK, 1 Failed

2006-10-29 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 29. Oktober 2006 10:06:42 +0100 yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oops! Sorry! I did not mean to cause any confusion: - AFAICT the 2.10 branch points already to the 3.3.0 tag. Right. However Philipp pointed out that the Zope 2 trunk uses the Zope 3 trunk right now. I pointed the rea

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 10 OK, 2 Failed, 2 Unknown

2006-10-29 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Oct 28 11:00:02 2006 UTC to Sun Oct 29 11:00:02 2006 UTC. There were 14 messages: 14 from Zope Unit Tests. Test failures - Subject: FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.3 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sat Oct 28 21:23:

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope Tests: 8 OK, 1 Failed

2006-10-29 Thread yuppie
Hi Andreas! Hi Philipp! Andreas Jung wrote: --On 28. Oktober 2006 23:50:36 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OMG, why are we using the 3.3 branch HEAD on the 2.10 branch??? This is how Stephan's fix got pulled into Zope 2 automatically and *automatically broke* Zope