Jim Fulton wrote:
Binaries, except for Windows, should never never be uploaded to PyPI (or
download.zope.org). There are just too many variables to building
binaries.
Yes, that's what I meant to ask for, PILwoTk-1.1.6.3 to PyPI as a source
release. I'm currently using
On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
Would someone be willing to add the PILwoTk-1.1.6.3(-py2.4-linux-
i686).egg
to PyPI?
Binaries, except for Windows, should never never be uploaded to PyPI
(or download.zope.org). There are just too many variables to
building binaries.
Would someone be willing to add the PILwoTk-1.1.6.3(-py2.4-linux-i686).egg
to PyPI?
If PILwoTk becomes a PyPI entry, I'd like to ask a follow-up on the Plone
list to see if ploneout buildouts can/should by default depend on PILwoTk
to satisfy Plone-3.0's PIL dependency.
I'm able to use PILwoTk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
[snip]
So I turned things around: if I state in my egg information that I
require another package that means I need to have that package
available and functional. Which suggests
Fred Drake wrote:
On 10/17/07, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right - but you're building an application, and you're pretty
experienced with Zope. A lot of Plone users just want to install a
plug-in (a product), basically. Before, they just dropped it into a
It sounds like your
Tres Seaver wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
[snip]
So I turned things around: if I state in my egg information that I
require another package that means I need to have that package
available and functional. Which suggests that its zcml has to be loaded
before mine. And that is exactly what I am
Hey,
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Fred Drake wrote:
[snip]
For example, say you want to install oi.plum. You need to add the line
'oi.plum' twice - once under 'eggs' and once under 'zcml' in your
buildout.cfg. Forget the latter, and the package doesn't work properly
(or at all).
I actually really
In the meantime, that URL is meant to be there forever, so those
who want it should feel free to use it.
- C
On Oct 19, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 19, 2007, at 6:44 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
If you mean sane in the sense of setuptools-compatible, I've
actually
If you mean sane in the sense of setuptools-compatible, I've actually
repackaged PIL to use setuptools here:
http://dist.repoze.org/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz
On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:17 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
Would someone be willing to add the
On Oct 19, 2007, at 6:44 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
If you mean sane in the sense of setuptools-compatible, I've
actually repackaged PIL to use setuptools here:
http://dist.repoze.org/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz
OK, so now we *both* have. :)
It would be better, IMO, if we could get Fredrik to make
On Friday 19 October 2007 21:17, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
I may not *want* the other package's ZCML to be loaded: some of its
policies may not be appropriate for my application.
+1. Happens to me all the time.
Since this appears to be a rare case that is the exception,
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Oct 18 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Fri Oct 19 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Thu Oct 18 20:52:00 EDT 2007
12 matches
Mail list logo
