Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-22 Thread Chris Withers
Andreas Jung wrote: - - removing ZClasses completely ...into a seperate egg/product, right? - - how do to a traditional SVN checkout of the Zope 2 and the related Zope 3 modules? The Zope2.buildout maintains its dependencies through a KGS - the old-style SVN checkout uses svn:external.

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-22 Thread Chris Withers
Stephan Richter wrote: On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Andreas Jung wrote: - RestrictedPython security audit: such an audit has been made by Stefan and Sidnei. I am not qualified to speak about the correctness of the audit. I assume they know what they were doing. Unless objections one

Re: [Zope-dev] Salt-weakness in zope.app.authentication passwordmanagers?

2009-01-22 Thread Uli Fouquet
Hi there, Shane Hathaway wrote: Uli Fouquet wrote: [snip] Any reviews by the more competent gurus in the list are highly appreciated. Your implementation and docs look fine to me. Thanks for reviewing! It's all in trunk now. The only comment I have is I wonder why this is

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-22 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22.01.2009 10:38 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote: Stephan Richter wrote: On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Andreas Jung wrote: - RestrictedPython security audit: such an audit has been made by Stefan and Sidnei. I am not qualified to speak about the

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-22 Thread Chris Withers
Andreas Jung wrote: It's a shame Jim has so little time to spend on this... Take your hat and collect some money for hiring Jim :-) Zope Corp chose to assume the Zope brand for themselves, given the prevelence of Zope 2 and RestrictedPython, it'd be nice if they could devote some of Jim's

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 8 OK

2009-01-22 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Jan 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Jan 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Jan 22 03:44:52 EST 2009 URL:

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.globalrequest?

2009-01-22 Thread Benji York
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote: I guess I might've been able to use the interaction directly in Zope 3's case and I shall study that. I suspect you already know the mechanics of getting the request from the interaction, but for the others, here's

Re: [Zope-dev] ZODB change notifications

2009-01-22 Thread Rowan Woodhouse
Laurence Rowe wrote: Rowan Woodhouse wrote: Hi, I've got two clients accessing the same object at the same time (one is Zope and the other is a worker interfacing to another system). In the worker client I need to detect a change to the value of an attribute made by the Zope client. I

[Zope-dev] Auto Generated Add Forms

2009-01-22 Thread Rowan Woodhouse
Hi, I'm trying to use auto-generated add forms in Zope 2.10-6 (Ubuntu) with Five but I'm having some trouble getting them to work. I've added the section below to my configure.zcml: snip configure.zcml browser:addform schema=.democontent.IDemoContent

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-22 Thread Stefan H. Holek
While we are at it... The biggest offender is the zodbcode package, which does not appear to pass its tests at all under Python 2.6. Not having investigated this further I can imagine three courses of action: 1) Fix zodbcode (me shrugs) 2) Exclude zodbcode tests from the test suite

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-22 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Jung wrote: Hi there, based on an earlier Zope 2.12 thread http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2008-October/033572.html I propose that we get out an alpha version of Zope 2.12 by end of February.

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-22 Thread Shane Hathaway
Chris Withers wrote: I don't think this is such a huge change, it's a change in the style of what RP does already, not a complete re-implementation... OTOH, with Python 3 now released, it seems unlikely that we'll see any new syntax added to Python 2.x. So RP doesn't really need any sort of