* Roger Ineichen d...@projekt01.ch [2009-03-09 02:12]:
The zope.container package was broken.
I added a missing ComponentLookupError import.
Also, there was a typo in that conditional branch, it should have been
self.context, not just context. I guess that's what I got for not writing a test
in
2009/3/10 Roger Ineichen d...@projekt01.ch:
Hi steering group and Dan
During update z3c.authenticator and replace the password with the
new zope.apssword implementation, I saw that the vocabulary
Passsword Manager Names is not available in the zope.password
package.
I think the password
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 23:35, Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think they are, according to PEP 3107 they are stored in the
func_annotations attribute of the function.
No, they are stored in __annotations__. Look here:
http://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html#new-syntax
2009/3/10 Martijn Pieters m...@zopatista.com:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 23:35, Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com wrote:
However, we can't be sure there won't be annotations for any callable
object, because even PEP says that ``we say function, we mean callable
object``, so one day we certainly will
Dan Korostelev wrote:
This was done to avoid dependency on zope.schema. However, I also find
it very useful to have that vocabulary in zope.password. I think we
can add it to the vocabulary submodule without adding dependency on
zope.schema at egg level, because one who wants to use the
2009/3/10 Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu:
Dan Korostelev wrote:
This was done to avoid dependency on zope.schema. However, I also find
it very useful to have that vocabulary in zope.password. I think we
can add it to the vocabulary submodule without adding dependency on
zope.schema at
Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/3/10 Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu:
Either you have a dependency and declare it or you don't have a
dependency. Since we don't want to use extras anymore, I think this
calls for another package which depends on zope.password and zope.schema.
I still don't
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com wrote:
If we do make changes for this purpose, I'd like to no longer use the
__*__ pattern.
+1 -- new or changed attributes should follow some other pattern
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
Currently, if an attribute expression evaluates to any value that's
boolean False, it's omitted (e.g. 0, , object()). I think that's
unexpected. Instead, attributes should only be omitted when the
expression evaluates to ``None``.
How do folks feel about changing this behavior in
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
How do folks feel about changing this behavior in ``zope.pagetemplate``.
The change would need to be in zope.tal.
I'm ambivalent; while it makes sense to me in isolation, the affect on
existing templates is undesirable, and
2009/3/10 Fred Drake fdr...@gmail.com:
The change would need to be in zope.tal.
True.
I'm ambivalent; while it makes sense to me in isolation, the affect on
existing templates is undesirable, and compatibility is a huge deal
for this bit of machinery.
I agree, but it would be interesting to
Hello,
svn co -r 93260 svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zc.table/trunk/src/zc/table
zc.table
fails for me with:
svn: Connection closed unexpectedly
(tried from different countries)
But... it works again?!?!? what the heck???
Anyone experiencing something like this?
--
Best regards,
Adam
works for me
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 16:17, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
svn co -r 93260 svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zc.table/trunk/src/zc/table
zc.table
fails for me with:
svn: Connection closed unexpectedly
(tried from different countries)
But... it works
Hello Andreas,
Works here again too.
Misterious was that it was working without -r 93260 and svn log
was also working.
Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 4:18:53 PM, you wrote:
AJ works for me
AJ On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 16:17, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
svn co -r 93260
Hello Roger,
Yes I mean that. Mostly on externals.
Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 5:37:43 PM, you wrote:
RI Hi
Betreff: [Zope-dev] svn.zope.org fails?
Hello,
svn co -r 93260
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zc.table/trunk/src/zc/table zc.table
fails for me with:
svn: Connection closed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 10, 2009, at 17:37 , Roger Ineichen wrote:
svn co -r 93260
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zc.table/trunk/src/zc/table zc.table
fails for me with:
svn: Connection closed unexpectedly
(tried from different countries)
I have that problem
2009/3/10 Roger Ineichen d...@projekt01.ch:
Hi Steering group, Hanno, Dan
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.password
Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/3/10 Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu:
Either you have a dependency and declare it or you don't have a
dependency. Since we don't want to use
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Either you have a dependency and declare it or you don't have a
dependency. Since we don't want to use extras anymore, I think this
calls for another package which depends on zope.password and zope.schema.
I still don't like/get the idea of
Hi people!
One of most large packages that really wants to be refactored but
still wasn't touched is zope.app.security. It has much in it and it
brings many dependencies, including zope.app.form and company. And
even some zope.* packages, like zope.securitypolicy still depend on
it. So, let's
Hi Stephan
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.password
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Either you have a dependency and declare it or you don't have a
dependency. Since we don't want to use extras anymore, I think
this calls for another package which depends on
Hi Dan
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.password
2009/3/10 Roger Ineichen d...@projekt01.ch:
Hi Steering group, Hanno, Dan
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.password
Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/3/10 Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu:
Either you have a dependency and declare it or
Hi Dan
Betreff: [Zope-dev] Proposal: refactoring of zope.app.security
Hi people!
One of most large packages that really wants to be refactored but
still wasn't touched is zope.app.security. It has much in it and it
brings many dependencies, including zope.app.form and company. And
even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/3/10 Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com:
Log message for revision 97815:
Note the change from Attribute to Field for in IChoice.
Actual message was: Note the change from Attribute to Field for
`vocabulary` in IChoice.
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Either you have a dependency and declare it or you don't have a
dependency. Since we don't want to use extras anymore, I think this
calls for another package which depends on zope.password and zope.schema.
I still don't
24 matches
Mail list logo
