ention, and branding that it deserves. that's great.
but i suggest you'd have more success in that effort if you said things like:
"Hey, all you people out there using the Zope 3 app server thingy... you
realize you have a branding problem, right? Now is a perfect time to revisit
Gary Poster wrote:
> This message seems like a reasonable start to me: "Zope 3 has become
> focused on supporting frameworks and applications, rather than trying
> to be one itself. It is now called the Zope Toolkit. Parts of it are
> used by Zope 2, Plone, Grok, Repoze.bfg, and by many ot
hi all,
in Zope's testrunner, the SOFTWARE_HOME is explicitly added to the front of
the python package lookup path, like so:
sys.path.insert(0, shome)
this doesn't happen in the same manner when you're actually starting a Zope
server. as a result, the test runner will not work in certain enviro
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Believe something very very rotten in Five's registerPackage was fixed
by Rocky in r72986 [1]. As far as I can tell this was never merged to
the 1.4 branch, but I could we wrong.
i can confirm that this seems to be helping. there's an easier way to
generate t
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 11:41 AM, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 3:38 AM, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Help appreciated!
Well, I suggest you forget about ZCML and try to use the CA directly
from Python. The Pylons people would probably app
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Rob Miller wrote:
honestly, it seems to me that buildout tries to do too much. it's
trying to handle both repeatable deployment recipes AND providing a
sandbox within which to run things. there may not be a point to
having an extra layer on top of buildout
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
whit wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
This is awesome, and by that I don't mean the fact that we have a
plone buildout, but that we actually have Zope 2 recipes for
buildout. I hope they can be moved to svn.zope.org for further
de
is there a current maintainer or development process for ZopeVersionControl?
there's been a little bit of activity lately, but it's still in CVS.
in any event, CMFEditions (a versioning system for Plone) depends on ZVC, and
it seems that some recent changes to Zope's DateTime implementation hav
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:11:05PM -0400, Brad Clements wrote:
| I've been doing a lot of work with Paste in the past year, cutting down on my
| deployments of Zope.
|
| Now I'm taking a new look at Zope 3 and Zope 2, and wondering if it's possible to
| use paste pipelin
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:59:49 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> --On 25. Juni 2006 16:32:04 +0200 "Stefan H. Holek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This, BTW, breaks CMF 1.5 on Zope 2.9. Not sure I/you should care
>>> though ;-)
>>>
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>
Chris Withers wrote:
Both core zope and Plone spew forth in their default state.
the deprecation warnings in Plone annoy me to no end. unfortunately, though,
Plone (thus far) has chosen to straddle Zope release. i can't fix the
deprecation warnings that Plone 2.5 generates with Zope 2.9, fo
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27 Mar 2006, at 11:55, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope
2.8 are u
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Strange how (most of) the Plone people seem to be so quick in willing to
sacrifice the Zope brand :(
um, if you reread what i said, and what i think rocky is trying to say,
i'm in favor of _keeping_ the zope brand for the app server, which is
what zope has always been
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:43:03 -0330, Rocky Burt wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-28-02 at 13:21 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> [snip]
>> > I would vote for spelling out Zed (which would also be a little easier
>> > to google but might create trademark problems). The names
another possible angle on all of this is CMFMember, which replaces the
default memberdata tool with one that provides Archetypes-based
memberdata objects. this already provides some (most?) of the
functionality you're suggesting in the userdirectory tool, i believe.
i'm pretty sure that Archet
The following DTML method works in Zope 2.1.6, but not in 2.2.0:
("testfs" is a LocalFS product installed in the method's folder)
In case we end in the middle of a row...
--
The error that this causes in 2.2.0 is:
16 matches
Mail list logo