AG> I created a sheet with versions
AG> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQ&output=html
AG> Right now it's a sort of highest version affordable after a quick scan
AG> through the version. I'm thinking about doing one more round to take a
AG> closer look and probably scre
Hello Marius,
Wednesday, March 31, 2010, 2:50:33 PM, you wrote:
...
MG> * look at other possible bugfix upgrades, see if there are any
MG>important bugs fixed (zope.release's bin/list-latest is useful here)
...
I created a sheet with versions
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q7
Hello Marius,
Just released zope.publisher 3.4.10.
Seems to have a LOT of fixes vs. 3.4.6
Wednesday, March 31, 2010, 2:50:33 PM, you wrote:
...
--
Best regards,
Adam GROSZERmailto:agros...@gmail.com
--
Quote of the day:
Civilization is a movement, not a condition;
Hello Wichert,
Because of our toolchain to release and deploy apps: mypypi and
keas.build. In fact, because of keas.build depends on zc.buildout.
Friday, April 2, 2010, 10:53:26 AM, you wrote:
WA> On 4/2/10 10:36 , Adam GROSZER wrote:
>> zc.buildout is a tough decision, because it's "not upgradi
On 4/2/10 10:36 , Adam GROSZER wrote:
> zc.buildout is a tough decision, because it's "not upgrading" issue.
> See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2010-March/015794.html
Why would you ever install zc.buildout systemwide? Just as with
setuptools I consider that to be a recipe for pr
Hello Marius,
+1 on a KGS 3.4.1
Local overrides here:
zope.component = 3.5.1
zope.contenttype = 3.4.2
zope.i18n = 3.5.0
zope.sendmail = 3.5.0
zope.server = 3.5.0
zope.session = 3.5.2
zope.tal = 3.5.0
zope.testing = 3.7.5 #was 3.7.0 but let's try this
zope.traversing = 3.5.0a4
zope.testbrowser =
Sebastien Douche a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 14:50, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>> Mostly I wanted to know if anybody was using the KGS in production and
>> interested in a point release.
>
> Yes! :)
>
>> I'm especially interested in setuptools 0.6c11, since
>> the KGS currently pins to 0.6c9
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 14:50, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> Mostly I wanted to know if anybody was using the KGS in production and
> interested in a point release.
Yes! :)
> I'm especially interested in setuptools 0.6c11, since
> the KGS currently pins to 0.6c9, which doesn't support Subversion 1.6
Hi,
Marius Gedminas a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:37:47PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
>> On 03/31/2010 12:35 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
>>> One point for the next agenda:
>>> As Marius also had the issue to do a KGS 3.4.1.
>
> Mostly I wanted to know if anybody was using the KGS in produ
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:37:47PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> On 03/31/2010 12:35 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> >One point for the next agenda:
> >As Marius also had the issue to do a KGS 3.4.1.
Mostly I wanted to know if anybody was using the KGS in production and
interested in a point release.
10 matches
Mail list logo
