Chris Withers wrote at 2005-10-11 07:50 +0100:
...
I dunno, it's very handy to be able to rely on something RDB-like being
installed when you want to tests things like ZSQL methods...
But, for ZSQL method tests you do not need a real DA;
a DA fake is sufficient
(you test ZSQL methods and not
Andreas Jung wrote:
Yes, it would be handy. But one could also install the stuff as
standalone product for people that really need it. I am really against
this proposal - maintaining yet another nice2have package is a burden
just for the sake of make the lifes of some people easier. Other
--On 11. Oktober 2005 07:50:34 +0100 Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
IMO there is no need to ship the Zope core with *any* DB package except
the ZODB.
I dunno, it's very handy to be able to rely on something RDB-like being
installed when you want to tests
Andreas Jung wrote:
IMO there is no need to ship the Zope core with *any* DB package except
the ZODB.
I dunno, it's very handy to be able to rely on something RDB-like being
installed when you want to tests things like ZSQL methods...
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management,
Andreas Jung wrote:
Argh...there is also a gadfly package coming from Zope 3. So when we
remove it from the Zope 2 core we get it back with Zope 3 :-)
Well, having a lightweight semi-functional rdb engine in the distro has
always seemed handy for me, mainly for testing rdb-related components
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 08:58:53AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
| Andreas Jung wrote:
| Argh...there is also a gadfly package coming from Zope 3. So when we
| remove it from the Zope 2 core we get it back with Zope 3 :-)
|
| Well, having a lightweight semi-functional rdb engine in the distro has
SQLite implements enough of a subset of SQL to be genuinely useful
and it's performance isn't too bad either. There is a Zope DA for it
somewhere too.
We've never been able to use Gadfly for testing as it's so far from
standard SQL that it just causes more problems than it solves - as we
--On 10. Oktober 2005 11:03:54 -0300 Sidnei da Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'm allowed to say anything, I would like to see gadfly being
replaced by sqlite. It's available mostly everywhere except in Windows
by default, as many products already use it. sqlite itself is 'public
This change breaks Gadfly which doesn't seem to like 'null' at all. I
poked around in ZGadflyDA/gadfly a bit, but it's not obvious to me
how to fix the parser (*.mar files anyone?).
Stefan
[snip]
File /usr/local/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZGadflyDA/
gadfly/kjParser.py, line
--On 8. Oktober 2005 15:41:57 +0200 Stefan H. Holek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This change breaks Gadfly which doesn't seem to like 'null' at all. I
poked around in ZGadflyDA/gadfly a bit, but it's not obvious to me how
to fix the parser (*.mar files anyone?).
No idea about the specific
--On 8. Oktober 2005 16:04:46 +0200 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--On 8. Oktober 2005 15:41:57 +0200 Stefan H. Holek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This change breaks Gadfly which doesn't seem to like 'null' at all. I
poked around in ZGadflyDA/gadfly a bit, but it's not obvious to me
11 matches
Mail list logo
