Re: [Zope-dev] Moving forward on Zope 2.6

2002-03-24 Thread Florent Guillaume
Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, yeah, thats true, it would be possible to have both, even though they aim to solve the same problem. Wouldn't it be a bit confusing to have both? Too may different ways of giving a person a role. The use cases are somewhat different though. I

Re: [Zope-dev] Moving forward on Zope 2.6

2002-03-20 Thread Florent Guillaume
Jim Penny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I needed a generalization of this scheme (and so ended up writing my own User Folder). We manufacture parts which are controlled by second parties, but bought primarily by third parties. I will call these parties Manufacturer, Brand Owners, and

Re: [Zope-dev] Moving forward on Zope 2.6

2002-03-20 Thread Lennart Regebro
From: Jim Penny [EMAIL PROTECTED] I now have two kinds of administrators, and two kinds of users. An interesting case. If I understand it correctly, with our workgroups scheme,the restricted administrators would have administration rights on a workgroup. They would then be able to create users

Re: [Zope-dev] Moving forward on Zope 2.6

2002-03-20 Thread Florent Guillaume
I'm trying to wrap my mind around what you call workgroups. By the way, have you reviewed the use cases for workgroups that I put in http://www.zope.org/Members/nuxeo/Products/NuxUserGroups/README.txt ? Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] With normal grouping, you typically have one

Re: [Zope-dev] Moving forward on Zope 2.6

2002-03-20 Thread Lennart Regebro
From: Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] No no no ! With NUG the Roles added to a group are still added at the local role level, which means that the 'bosses' group only has a Boss role where you want it. Yes, of course. But what I was aiming at is that all the Bosses have Boss right at all

Re: [Zope-dev] Moving forward on Zope 2.6

2002-03-20 Thread Jim Penny
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 07:01:13PM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote: From: Jim Penny [EMAIL PROTECTED] I now have two kinds of administrators, and two kinds of users. An interesting case. If I understand it correctly, with our workgroups scheme,the restricted administrators would have

Re: [Zope-dev] Moving forward on Zope 2.6

2002-03-20 Thread Florent Guillaume
Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With workgroups you create ten workgroups. Within each workgrup you assign users to their respective roles. You then add the workgroups to the correct places in the hierarchy. It also opens for the possibility to assign workgroup managers that can

Re: [Zope-dev] Moving forward on Zope 2.6

2002-03-19 Thread Matt Behrens
Florent Guillaume wrote: Okay, I'm a bit late but I'd like to integrate what's currently in NuxUserGroups, a bit updated maybe. http://www.zope.org/Members/nuxeo/Products/NuxUserGroups There will be a merge conflit with Lennart's Local roles blacklists, it it's chosen for 2.6, but I'm

Re: [Zope-dev] Moving forward on Zope 2.6

2002-03-19 Thread Lennart Regebro
I also want groups! But I want a different kind of groups, that I call workgroups just to distinguish them from all other types of groups. :-) I don't know if it's possible implement this compatibly in 2.x, and I can't judge if there is any problems in implementing one type of groups in 2.x and

Re: [Zope-dev] Moving forward on Zope 2.6

2002-03-19 Thread Jim Penny
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 04:11:05PM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote: I also want groups! But I want a different kind of groups, that I call workgroups just to distinguish them from all other types of groups. :-) I don't know if it's possible implement this compatibly in 2.x, and I can't judge if

Re: [Zope-dev] Moving forward on Zope 2.6

2002-03-16 Thread Florent Guillaume
I think that this needs to happen Real Soon. I propose that this friday (the 15th) is the deadline for adding/volunteering for the 2.6 plan. Okay, I'm a bit late but I'd like to integrate what's currently in NuxUserGroups, a bit updated maybe.