That would work, however I just dont think that fits neatly into the ZODB in
any way since all objects are appended.
Small confusion here: "ZODB" is a higher-level abstraction than
"FileStorage"; it is quite feasible to have one or more storages
inside your Zope which are
Shane Hathaway wrote:
I've added logic to sort the modules by dependency before performing the
refresh. It should solve the simian problem. Feedback encouraged!
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/Refresh/
Perhaps a stupid question, but is the Refresh product Refreshable? ;-)
*looks
Shane Hathaway wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/ZDebug
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/Refresh
Just noticed, since I installed these yesterday, the icon for the Python product
I'm developing has changed to a ZCatalog icon. I'm using refresh on that product
a lot adn ZDebug
When starting Zope2.3 from the freebsd box, the kernel says : file: table is
full.
The kern.maxfiles is set to 1064, does zope really need that many? what
number should I need to make zope happy?
Rgs,
Kent Sin
-
kentsin.weblogs.com
kentsin.imeme.net
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Steve Alexander wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
...it is quite feasible to have one or more storages
inside your Zope ... often at a non-trivial time cost.
Where does the time cost come in? I've noticed a delay on first
mounting another storage, but I haven't looked
Just got this when I hit the refresh button:
Exception type: SyntaxError
Exception value: invalid syntax
Traceback:
File "E:\Zope\2.3.0\lib\python\Products\Refresh\RefreshPatch.py", line 253, in
manage_performRefresh
RefreshFuncs.performFullRefresh(
File
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Johan Carlsson wrote:
Small confusion here: "ZODB" is a higher-level abstraction than
"FileStorage"; it is quite feasible to have one or more storages
inside your Zope which are "packless" / "undo-less", and which
then have the space efficiencies you are looking
Chris Withers wrote:
...now I presume that's 'cos there's a syntax error in my module's code. Is
there anyway I can get something like the tracebacks you get when you restart
Zope and this kindof thing happens?
Actually, the traceback I was looking for shows up in exactly the same palce as
partly on chaos theory, Jim's three laws of engineering (1. F=MA, 2. You
can't solve a problem unless you know the answer, 3. You can't push a
rope) and on the abundance of Thai food.
Perhaps I need more beer but whats: F=MA?
--
Andy McKay.
- Original Message -
From: "Michel
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/ZDebug
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/Refresh
Just noticed, since I installed these yesterday, the icon for the Python product
I'm developing has changed to a ZCatalog icon. I'm using refresh on
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Andy McKay wrote:
Perhaps I need more beer but whats: F=MA?
Force = Mass x Acceleration
ie. the harder you kick the beer can the faster it will accelerate for any
given amount of beer in it. a.k.a why kicking empty beers can hurt your
toes less than kicking full ones.
Ah that one. I was looking too deeply for something amusing there.
--
Andy McKay.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Hamilton" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Andy McKay" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Michel Pelletier" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Erik Enge" [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
On 12 Feb 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
[Jon Franz]
| I had this problem in the past and hacked the mysql DA to fix it, then
| dicovered to my dismay I was using an out-of-date mysqlDA and it had already
| been fixed... Which DA are you using?
Using Python 2.0 could solve this
[Michel Pelletier]
| We would love to see this description from you.
The description of such a system/model in a Fishbowl project? Or just
a general description? Sorry for being slow :)
| I think it would be great to get examples of your problems in a case
| study format, but also in a
All,
I've got a Zope 2.3 server that's being used as a file server through
webdav. It seems to work fine and I'm working on extending it through
hookable_put.
I've notice some strange behavior in the transactions when trying to
'undo' binary files upload through webdav. It throws an error
A draft of my Berkeley storage proposal is now in the fishbowl:
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/BerkeleyStorage
Feel free to add your comments to the wiki.
-Barry
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you bump maxusers up to 64 (from the default 32) and rebuild
the kernel the messages should go away... it's worked for me.
-steve
"RDM" == Zope mailing lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RDM On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Sin Hang Kin wrote:
When starting Zope2.3 from the freebsd box, the
I'll probably figure this out as soon as I post like last time, but I've
been staring at it and can't see my mistake. The following code returns
a list of None's:
objs = []
for catent in container.Catalog(context.REQUEST):
objs.append(container.Catalog.getobject(catent.data_record_id_))
"R. David Murray" wrote:
objs = []
for catent in container.Catalog(context.REQUEST):
objs.append(container.Catalog.getobject(catent.data_record_id_))
return objs
I've checked, and catent is a mybrains instance and catent.data_record_id_
has an increasing number as its value. So why
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"R. David Murray" wrote:
catent.getobject()
That would seem to be a lot more OOish.
In 2.3 you can call catent.getObject(). You can pass an optional REQUEST
in as an argument, to support lookup via resolve_url rather than
restrictedTraverse.
--
Steve
"R. David Murray" wrote:
I'll probably figure this out as soon as I post like last time, but I've
been staring at it and can't see my mistake. The following code returns
a list of None's:
objs = []
for catent in container.Catalog(context.REQUEST):
What's wrong with AbstractCatalogBrain.getObject()? Doesn't that work?
-Randy
-Original Message-
From: Casey Duncan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 3:45 PM
To: R. David Murray; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Calling Catalog from python
22 matches
Mail list logo
