I have to disagree about the Zope (%s), I have been known to run 2 or 3 Zope
services, for different instances, and I always know that I can find them
all huddled together at the bottom of the Service Manager - Very useful.
Adrian...
--
Adrian Hungate
Try Zope -
http://www.zope.org
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 16:26, Adrian Hungate wrote:
I have to disagree about the Zope (%s), I have been known to run 2 or 3
Zope services, for different instances, and I always know that I can find
them all huddled together at the bottom of the Service Manager - Very
useful.
So does
I edit the registry... One of my many favourite pass-times, right up there
with running out in traffic.
Seriously though, once an instance is configured, why would you want to
change it? (Assuming you get it right that is)
Adrian...
--
Adrian Hungate
Try Zope -
http://www.zope.org
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 16:41, Adrian Hungate wrote:
I edit the registry... One of my many favourite pass-times, right up there
with running out in traffic.
Seriously though, once an instance is configured, why would you want to
change it? (Assuming you get it right that is)
Mostly the
Paul Everitt wrote:
At last, the announcement I've been dying to make. After much
deliberation -- meaning, I've procrastinated for too long :^) -- I'm
pleased to announce our approach for opening the CVS repository to
community checkins.
Cool, at last!
Martijn Faassen wrote:
http://dev.zope.org/CVS/Contributor.pdf
This says 'you must indicate your agreement to the term below'; shouldn't
it be 'terms'?
Uhh...well...yes! I'll make the change. I'm waiting for news back from
the lawyer about provisions for handling patches. I'll then
Paul Everitt wrote:
Does anyone think this is close enough that I can go ahead and get the
bootstrap group (under ten, selected by us) going? I'd like to avoid
making them sign and mail an agreement, then do it again if there's
substantive changes.
Yup :-)
Chris
Jay, Dylan wrote:
Zope looks nice but I found it has two potential problems.
1. WYSIWYG editing
ZPT, WebDAV, etc
2. Source control (by ClearCase)
Well, I just used FS-based CMF skins and python Products maintained with CVS to
control the 'code'. I don't believe 'data' should ever
I discovered that if I define the PROPFIND method on the
LockNullResource class as follows:
def PROPFIND(self, REQUEST, RESPONSE):
Retrieve properties defined on the resource.
self.dav__init(REQUEST, RESPONSE)
cmd=davcmds.PropFind(REQUEST)
- Original Message -
From: Jay, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:01 PM
Subject: [Zope-dev] RE: Barriers to Zope popularity: Part 2: source control
-Original Message-
From: Kenichi Sato
Sent: Monday, 24 September 2001 5:49
I'd like to add some misinformation...errmm, comments. :^) On the
version control side, you're quite right, we're still behind on it.
There _are_ some ways to get there, if you try hard enough. But that's
unacceptible.
There are two things long term that need to be done: filesystem
Does anyone think this is close enough that I can go ahead and get the
bootstrap group (under ten, selected by us) going? I'd like to avoid
making them sign and mail an agreement, then do it again if there's
substantive changes.
Go for it.
OK, a response. Sorry for the delay.
First, I'll change the part of the introduction that says:
Essentially, a committer signs an agreement stating that all
code that the committer submits has been created by her.
...to say:
Essentially, a committer signs an agreement stating that
Does anyone think this is close enough that I can go ahead and get the
bootstrap group (under ten, selected by us) going? I'd like to avoid
making them sign and mail an agreement, then do it again if there's
substantive changes.
Have fun with it.
Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I think this really should be an integration issue instead of a
Zope issue: use a front-end proxy server (i.e. Squid) and set up ACLs to
prevent this...
This hasn't been fixed because it's not well
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Paul Everitt wrote:
Repugnancy aside :^) your second comment is on the mark. It isn't so
much that you need to assign and lose ownership. Rather, the
committer needs to ensure that they aren't violating your rights.
We'll probably work up some boilerplate such as, I'm
Ken Manheimer wrote:
Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This hasn't been fixed because it's not well understood. Javascript can
POST an invisible form, AFAIK. The problem occurs on the browsers of
users who are *already authenticated*. It has nothing to do with Zope
or any server
On Tue, 2001-09-25 at 09:19, Paul Everitt wrote:
We'll probably work up some boilerplate such as, I'm going to commit
your patch to Zope. It's going to be available under the ZPL and the
joint ownership model of the Zope Contributor Agreement. Please respond
agreeing that you
On Tue, 2001-09-25 at 05:27, Paul Everitt wrote:
Does anyone think this is close enough that I can go ahead and get the
bootstrap group (under ten, selected by us) going? I'd like to avoid
making them sign and mail an agreement, then do it again if there's
substantive changes.
Full
Jeff Nielsen / UgoFast writes:
Can anyone tell me how to create a subdirectory programmatically under a
LocalFS folder? I have a LocalFS folder called images. When I add a new
promoter to my site, I'd like to automatically add a directory that
would hold that promoter's images. If the
On Sun, 2001-09-23 at 17:00, Andy McKay wrote:
[snip]
Haven't we been complaining about this automatic appending of
tracebacks for
a while? To me this is what log files are for but Im not sure what this
guy is on. I wouldnt count this as a security vulnerability.
Hmm. It's 'side-band'
2. Source control (by ClearCase)
Well, I just used FS-based CMF skins and python Products
maintained with CVS to
control the 'code'. I don't believe 'data' should ever be put
under the kind of
source control you're talking about here...
The discussion was about over-the-web
On Tue, 2001-09-25 at 18:16, Chris Withers wrote:
PS: Anyone using DTML or ZClasses for this kind of thing in this day and age
should be shot ;-)
Personally, I think all extremists and fanatics should be shot.
Oh yeah, I forgot, ;-)
Michael.
I've got Zope code and installation pretty heavily automated here,
but one thing that takes a while is that after a cvs update, I have
to do a complete wo_pcgi on each box to make sure everything's up to
date. This forces everything to be rebuilt. Is there anything that
could be done to make it
I guess its because Zope installs into the same directory as the service
name. So I always pick a name starting with Zope, so my installation is say
ZopeTest and my service is Zope (ZopeTest) :)
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Hungate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Andy' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Hi folks,
I'm having some troubles trying to develop a
particular zope object and would really appreciate a
bit of help. I'll explain what I'm trying to do:
What we have is a tree of nodes rooted in a folder
(excuse my ascii art) like so:
+ DocumentRoot (folder)
+ a
+ b
+ c
26 matches
Mail list logo
