Paul Everitt wrote:
> At last, the announcement I've been dying to make. After much
> deliberation -- meaning, I've procrastinated for too long :^) -- I'm
> pleased to announce our approach for opening the CVS repository to
> community checkins.
Cool, at last!
> http://dev.zope.org/CVS/Contri
Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> http://dev.zope.org/CVS/Contributor.pdf
>>
>
> This says 'you must indicate your agreement to the term below'; shouldn't
> it be 'terms'?
Uhh...well...yes! I'll make the change. I'm waiting for news back from
the lawyer about provisions for handling patches. I'l
Paul Everitt wrote:
>
> Does anyone think this is close enough that I can go ahead and get the
> bootstrap group (under ten, selected by us) going? I'd like to avoid
> making them sign and mail an agreement, then do it again if there's
> substantive changes.
Yup :-)
Chris
"Jay, Dylan" wrote:
>
> > Zope looks nice but I found it has two potential problems.
> >
> > 1. WYSIWYG editing
ZPT, WebDAV, etc
> > 2. Source control (by ClearCase)
Well, I just used FS-based CMF skins and python Products maintained with CVS to
control the 'code'. I don't believe 'data' sho
> I discovered that if I define the PROPFIND method on the
> LockNullResource class as follows:
>
> def PROPFIND(self, REQUEST, RESPONSE):
> """Retrieve properties defined on the resource."""
> self.dav__init(REQUEST, RESPONSE)
> cmd=davcmds.PropFind(REQUEST)
>
- Original Message -
From: "Jay, Dylan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:01 PM
Subject: [Zope-dev] RE: Barriers to Zope popularity: Part 2: source control
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kenichi Sato
> > Sent: Monday, 24 September
I'd like to add some misinformation...errmm, comments. :^) On the
version control side, you're quite right, we're still behind on it.
There _are_ some ways to get there, if you try hard enough. But that's
unacceptible.
There are two things long term that need to be done: filesystem
synchro
> Does anyone think this is close enough that I can go ahead and get the
> bootstrap group (under ten, selected by us) going? I'd like to avoid
> making them sign and mail an agreement, then do it again if there's
> substantive changes.
Go for it.
__
OK, a response. Sorry for the delay.
First, I'll change the part of the introduction that says:
"Essentially, a committer signs an agreement stating that all
code that the committer submits has been created by her."
...to say:
"Essentially, a committer signs an agreement stating that
> Does anyone think this is close enough that I can go ahead and get the
> bootstrap group (under ten, selected by us) going? I'd like to avoid
> making them sign and mail an agreement, then do it again if there's
> substantive changes.
Have fun with it.
__
Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Personally, I think this really should be an integration issue instead of a
> > Zope issue: use a front-end proxy server (i.e. Squid) and set up ACLs to
> > prevent this...
>
>
> This hasn't been fixed because it's not wel
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Paul Everitt wrote:
> Repugnancy aside :^) your second comment is on the mark. It isn't so
> much that you need to assign and "lose" ownership. Rather, the
> committer needs to ensure that they aren't violating your rights.
>
> We'll probably work up some boilerplate such as
Ken Manheimer wrote:
> Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>This hasn't been fixed because it's not well understood. Javascript can
>>POST an invisible form, AFAIK. The problem occurs on the browsers of
>>users who are *already authenticated*. It has nothing to do with Zope
>>or any ser
On Tue, 2001-09-25 at 09:19, Paul Everitt wrote:
>
> We'll probably work up some boilerplate such as, "I'm going to commit
> your patch to Zope. It's going to be available under the ZPL and the
> joint ownership model of the Zope Contributor Agreement. Please respond
> agreeing that you unde
On Tue, 2001-09-25 at 05:27, Paul Everitt wrote:
>
> Does anyone think this is close enough that I can go ahead and get the
> bootstrap group (under ten, selected by us) going? I'd like to avoid
> making them sign and mail an agreement, then do it again if there's
> substantive changes.
Full
Jeff Nielsen / UgoFast writes:
> Can anyone tell me how to create a subdirectory programmatically under a
> LocalFS folder? I have a LocalFS folder called images. When I add a new
> promoter to my site, I'd like to automatically add a directory that
> would hold that promoter's images. If the
On Sun, 2001-09-23 at 17:00, Andy McKay wrote:
>
> [snip]
> Haven't we been complaining about this automatic appending of
tracebacks for
> a while? To me this is what log files are for but Im not sure what this
> guy is on. I wouldnt count this as a "security vulnerability".
Hmm. It's 'side-b
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Withers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 September 2001 10:59 PM
> To: Jay, Dylan
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] RE: Barriers to Zope popularity: Part
> 2: source
> control
>
>
> "Jay, Dylan" wrote:
> >
> > > Zope lo
> > > > 2. Source control (by ClearCase)
> >
> > Well, I just used FS-based CMF skins and python Products
> > maintained with CVS to
> > control the 'code'. I don't believe 'data' should ever be put
> > under the kind of
> > source control you're talking about here...
>
> The discussion was about
On Tue, 2001-09-25 at 18:16, Chris Withers wrote:
>
> PS: Anyone using DTML or ZClasses for this kind of thing in this day and age
> should be shot ;-)
Personally, I think all extremists and fanatics should be shot.
Oh yeah, I forgot, ;-)
Michael.
___
Dieter,
I don't think I'm understanding you. I want to create the subdirectory
programmitcally inside a DTML Document. Are you suggesting something
like:
or
(Neither one works. I tried them.)
Do I need a more recent version of LocalFS? I'm using v0.9.6 (I think).
It doesn't appear that v0.10
I've got Zope code and installation pretty heavily automated here,
but one thing that takes a while is that after a cvs update, I have
to do a complete wo_pcgi on each box to make sure everything's up to
date. This forces everything to be rebuilt. Is there anything that
could be done to make it o
I guess its because Zope installs into the same directory as the service
name. So I always pick a name starting with Zope, so my installation is say
ZopeTest and my service is Zope (ZopeTest) :)
- Original Message -
From: "Adrian Hungate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Andy'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi folks,
I'm having some troubles trying to develop a
particular zope object and would really appreciate a
bit of help. I'll explain what I'm trying to do:
What we have is a tree of nodes rooted in a folder
(excuse my ascii art) like so:
+ DocumentRoot (folder)
+ a
+ b
+ c
24 matches
Mail list logo
