Hello Benji,
+1
for keeping the default as no subprocess and keeping the teardown.
The others already said the reasons.
--
Best regards,
Adam GROSZERmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Quote of the day:
It is a great mistake to suppose that God is only, or even chiefly,
On 2008-07-04 01:19:47 +0200, Graham Stratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've checked in a branch with changes to the testbrowser.real code to
make it work with mozlab 0.1.9 (and firefox 3).
Hi Sebastian,
This is great. I spent all day yesterday trying to make this happen
and didn't get
Am 04.07.2008 um 07:37 schrieb Christian Theune:
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 02:10 +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 01:39:28PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
[...]
I can explicitly make the URL use '@@viewname' and bypass the
item traverser,
but I don't like the @@s in the
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Jul 3 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Jul 4 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Jul 3 20:53:07 EDT 2008
URL:
While using the zc.testbrowser.real testbrowser we encountered a 'bug'
in browser.contents. The doctype and html-tags are swallowed.
I submitted a bug fix in #87999 on my branch.
Regards,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Wehrmann · [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gocept gmbh co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Benji York [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on making the zope.testing test runner run tests in
parallelized subprocesses. The option will likely be spelled -j N,
where N is the maximum number of processes.
The branch
--On 4. Juli 2008 02:05:30 +0300 Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently I migrated a large-ish app built on Zope 3.2 to Zope 3.4.
(About time I hear someone mumbling in the audience.) One strange
difference was that TALES iterators swapped the meaning of odd and even,
i.e.
p
Hi.
Benji York wrote:
If you use zc.buildout, then you can try the branch by checking it out,
adding a develop entry into your buildout config referencing it, and
updating any version spec for zope.testing to 3.6dev. I'd really like
third-party confirmation of the total test time reductions
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On 6/25/08, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool. Are the deprecation warning common to Zope 2.11 across all platforms?
I don't see a reason why not, specially if coming from that module.
Did we as a community really release a stable version that emits
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
I'm curious about the plans of Zope 3 on Python 2.5.
Me too, and I have been for ages, but I've gotten nowhere :-(
* Are people using Zope 3 with Python 2.5 already? What are your
experiences?
Apparently, it's all good to go, even RestrictedPython.
The
Hi Benji,
I've read the whole thread to date but thought I'd reply here...
Benji York wrote:
I'm working on making the zope.testing test runner run tests in
parallelized subprocesses. The option will likely be spelled -j N,
where N is the maximum number of processes.
Cool :-)
But please
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 06:05:05PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 4. Juli 2008 02:05:30 +0300 Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently I migrated a large-ish app built on Zope 3.2 to Zope 3.4.
(About time I hear someone mumbling in the audience.) One strange
difference was that
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:50:34AM -0400, Benji York wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Benji York [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on making the zope.testing test runner run tests in
parallelized subprocesses. The option will likely be spelled -j N,
where N is the maximum number
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried this in a Zope 3.4 checkout I had handy on a Core 2 Duo machine
(1.8 GHz, running 64-bit Ubuntu Hardy). One test module could not be
loaded, which explains the slightly lower number of tests reported:
Here are
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 05:44:12PM -0400, Benji York wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried this in a Zope 3.4 checkout I had handy on a Core 2 Duo machine
(1.8 GHz, running 64-bit Ubuntu Hardy). One test module could not be
loaded, which
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 05:44:12PM -0400, Benji York wrote:
There's no appreciable bookkeeping for the parallelization, so I don't
know where the CPU time is going.
Every layer is spawned in a separate subprocess,
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are the results:
time# tests
realusersystem reported
old test runner 3m16.033s 2m44.670s 0m2.832s
17 matches
Mail list logo
