Hi,
Can anyone tell me a way to get Zope Objects from the first
Zope-Installation to the second.
I need this because i have to program a Product to putting data into
different Zope Installations from one point of the Web.
My boss want this way because he want a central point for data input,
Toby Dickenson wrote:
Zope security is context based: Users can be defined in a subfolder and only
have access under that folder, they can also be given local roles for a
given folder. The role:permission mapping is set per-folder. Any security
aware object needs to know its context.
Yeah,
Anyone know what those attributes are?
Heres a good trick: add this method to your class to see which attributes it
is asked for, but doesnt implement.
def __getattr__(self,id,reg={}):
if not reg.has_key(id):
print `id`
reg[id]=id
raise
Andre Schubert wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone tell me a way to get Zope Objects from the first
Zope-Installation to the second.
I need this because i have to program a Product to putting data into
different Zope Installations from one point of the Web.
My boss want this way because he want a
Thanks for the advice (below). I added another parameter for meta type and
everything works great. What's the advantage of using Python Method rather
than an external method, other than thru-the-web editing? Any disadvantages?
At 10/24/00 06:45 PM, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
Write a Python
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:31:52 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the Zope object knows how to produce the data themselves, they
could push producer(s) directly to the channel. I added a single
check in ZServer.HTTPResponse(256) where a temporary file is only
created
Toby Dickenson wrote:
On 24 Oct 2000 15:14:24 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ty Sarna) wrote:
Unfortunately there are a lot of things that Zope just can't do because
there is no way to get a persistent "ticket" for an object that can be
handed out to some external system, and then later redeemed
How does this differ from Local FS?
cheers,
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been building an "ExternalFile" class which stores the body of
the file in an external file, mirroring the Zope path/hierarchy. This
will allow easy integration with servers that can mount the external
Toby Dickenson wrote:
Yeah, I'd love an ID I could use to grab an object no matter how often
it was used.
I suspect you will have to build this yourself. Store a sufficiently random
id inside your objects when they are created, and use a ZCatalog to index
them.
blech! ;-)
Why
Chris Withers wrote:
I suspect you will have to build this yourself. Store a sufficiently random
id inside your objects when they are created, and use a ZCatalog to index
them.
blech! ;-)
This is the normal way to keep references to objects. I asked Jim Fulton at
IPC8, and he
The WriteLocking RiskFactors artifact has had some new work done on it and
I'm interested in some editorial comments and review before work begins on
Architecture and UseCases.
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/WriteLocking/RiskFactors
Make any comments you have at:
Johan Carlsson wrote:
Why are the _p_oid depriciated?
Not depreciated, just "don't use them."
--
Itamar S.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fingerprint = D365 7BE8 B81E 2B18 6534 025E D0E7 92DB E441 411C
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is not much difference between the ExternalFile class I'm working
with and the File objects produced by LocalFS except External Files can
be put anywhere in the Zope hierarchy and LocalFS files need to be under
a LocalFS. Each approach has its pros and cons.
This proposal mostly deals
I should also note that if you create a producer, you will have to
override the __len__ method to return the entire length of the data.
This is because RESPONSE.write doesn't allow you to set the
length of a
write and there code during output that checks the size of the written
object.
Johan Carlsson wrote:
Why are the _p_oid depriciated?
Not depreciated, just "don't use them."
But I want too, why shouldn't I?
They solves my problems with mapping relational data to objects.
If I were to use my own random id generator I would need a global
registry for my UID. I
Johan Carlsson wrote:
Why are the _p_oid depriciated?
Not depreciated, just "don't use them."
But I want too, why shouldn't I?
They solves my problems with mapping relational data to objects.
I would guess multiple databases can have the same oid's for their objects -
and Zope does
Hi,
do anyone know how to generate my own error message if there is a authorization
problem? The standard_error_message.html do not influence the response from zope.
Thanks, Hannes
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am trying to get Login Manager working and I am getting the following
error message when I add the LoginManager type to a user folder, has anyone
encountered this before ?
Thanks,
Kim Friesen
__ACTION__
Add User Folder
Add Login Manager to User Folder
Error
__PRODUCTS__
Toby Dickenson:
Thanks for the advice.
I have looked at that before, and having a hybrid ZClass/Python product
seemed to place a lot of design considerations heavily in the python base
class. I've looked _holdOntoYourButts before as well.
Thanks again,
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:16:30 GMT,
-Original Message-
From: ethan mindlace fremen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 2:45 PM
To: Glen Becker
Cc: Zope Webmaster
Subject: Re: FastCGI under IIS
Glen Becker wrote:
Apparently, Zope has support for FastCGI under IIS. We want to find a
FastCGI
groove.net has a lot of potential for coordinating open-source projects...
maybe someone can schedule one of those hairy zope-xml discussions on there.
-josh
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
oops, sorry I didn't mean a 'User Folder' ...
I actually added a 'Folder' and then added a 'Login Manager' to that Folder.
I also tried this with a 'Folder w/Customizer Support'
Thanks,
Kim Friesen
Message: 11
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ty Sarna)
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] UnboundLocalError :
The fastCGI plugin for IIS is unfortunately not open source. FastCGI bought
it and you now have to pay for it. Try pcgi instead.
http://www.fastcgi.com/
- Original Message -
From: "Becker, Glen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 12:41 PM
Subject:
Ender writes:
Point taken.
Jason Spisak wrote:
Ender writes:
Jason Spisak wrote:
The only problem I am dealing with is size.
What kind of a transaction will that be?
Huge, no doubt.
I would run out of space to buffer it. Does Zope do subtransactions now,
24 matches
Mail list logo
