Hi Jeffrey & all
I'd just like to check something ..
When running LDAP in a master/slave setup, if a client of the
slave tries to update the directory, the slave returns a referral
(pointing at the master) to the client, and the client has to
retry the update at the master. That's steps 3 and 4 i
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 11:33:54PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Paul Winkler wrote at 2003-2-24 16:27 -0500:
> > ...
> > > It is easy to optimize this to "u + a" (via a dictionary),
> > > then thousands of roles should not be a problem.
> >
> > would that mean you have to build a (potent
> I, for one, think that proper grammar in checkins, source code
> and wikis is wonderful, and beneficial in the same way as syntax
> highlighting in editors.
Agreed.
> While reading Zope source in the past, I have, a couple of times,
> made diffs fixing niggly grammatical issues (I can be compul
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
> I'm sorry to bring forward the topic of grammar,
I, for one, think that proper grammar in checkins, source code
and wikis is wonderful, and beneficial in the same way as syntax
highlighting in editors.
While reading Zope source in the past, I have, a couple of times,
made diffs fixing niggly gra
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 1:53 am, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Hurm. I can't answer this directly, but I have done the same as you and
> > divorced ZPT completely from Zope for Roundup. See http://roundup.sf.net/
> > in the roundup.cgi.[PageTemplates|TAL|ZTUtils] packages.
>
> I wonder if it would be wor
Paul Winkler wrote at 2003-2-24 16:27 -0500:
> ...
> > It is easy to optimize this to "u + a" (via a dictionary),
> > then thousands of roles should not be a problem.
>
> would that mean you have to build a (potentially huge) dictionary every
> time? I'd greatly appreciate it if you co
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 1:26 am, Kevin Smith wrote:
> This works!! Thank you! Do you keep your Page Templates up-to-date
> with Zope's, or is this version going to stay the way it is from now
> on? It looks like you did what I was trying to do (i.e. put a wrapper
> around the existing code) so that
Brian Brinegar wrote at 2003-2-24 16:10 -0500:
> After some more poking around, I've simplified the problem. I have a
> product I created with a __call__ method:
>
>def __call__(self, client=None, REQUEST={}, RESPONSE=None, **kw):
>"""
>Call the selected template in the
Leonardo Rochael Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I think you need dynamically calculated local roles. This can be
> achieved by a user folder that returns a user object that overrides
> ".getRolesInContext(object)" to take the location (or any other
> attribute, such as an acquired "site")
Are you mainly concerned about the http headers in the response, or the
response body? If it is just the headers, Squid's log_mime_hdrs feature
will log all HTTP headers from both the request and response for you for
each request. If nothing else, perhaps it's a start...
Sean
-Original Mess
> Hurm. I can't answer this directly, but I have done the same as you and
> divorced ZPT completely from Zope for Roundup. See http://roundup.sf.net/ in
> the roundup.cgi.[PageTemplates|TAL|ZTUtils] packages.
I wonder if it would be worth our while to make sure that ZPT is
separately usable, jus
This works!! Thank you! Do you keep your Page Templates up-to-date
with Zope's, or is this version going to stay the way it is from now
on? It looks like you did what I was trying to do (i.e. put a wrapper
around the existing code) so that updates only required you to get the
newest version
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 12:08 pm, Romain Slootmaekers wrote:
> We need this in our 3th line support, were we want to be able to follow
> all ins and outs for singled out user (fi filtered on cookie).
> We also need to be able to turn this on/off at runtime.
I would do this in the front-end pr
Clemens Robbenhaar wrote:
Hi Romain,
> Yo,
>
> searching the zope site and googling yielded too many data and no info,
> so I might as well ask it here.
>
> We are very interested in finding out the exact HTTP Responses that the
> zope server pushes towards the client.
>
> So is ther
Hi Romain,
> Yo,
>
> searching the zope site and googling yielded too many data and no info,
> so I might as well ask it here.
>
> We are very interested in finding out the exact HTTP Responses that the
> zope server pushes towards the client.
>
> So is there a low level hook for lo
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:41:01PM +0100, Oliver Bleutgen wrote:
Since your application might not be suited for that scheme, it might be
worth throwing out roles altogether. How about creating a role for each
user (i.e. user "user_id" get's just the role "user_id", instead of
Andreas Jung wrote:
http://hathaway.freezope.org/Software/TCPWatch
Apparantly, I forgot to mention this:
proxying isn't an option either.
You can't just, on the fly, put a proxy between several components in a
production setup.
Sloot.
--On Dienstag, 25. Februar 2003 11:24 +0100 Romain Slootmaek
http://hathaway.freezope.org/Software/TCPWatch
--On Dienstag, 25. Februar 2003 11:24 +0100 Romain Slootmaekers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yo,
searching the zope site and googling yielded too many data and no info,
so I might as well ask it here.
We are very interested in finding out the exact H
Yo,
searching the zope site and googling yielded too many data and no info,
so I might as well ask it here.
We are very interested in finding out the exact HTTP Responses that the
zope server pushes towards the client.
So is there a low level hook for logging the http responses ?
We want the e
20 matches
Mail list logo
