Put it in the Plone issue tracker, and we'll have a look at it.
PS: Don't cross-post to lists when you want to ask several lists about the
same - post individual messages, a lot of people don't like cross-posting.
(Personally I don't really care, but... :)
-- Alexander
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I've made changes so that Five and (Zope 2.9 & Zope 2 trunk) send
IContainerModifiedEvents when appropriate. These events are new in Zope
3.2, and subclass IObjectModifiedEvents.
This is of course available in Five 1.2 and Five 1.3.
I still have to stich in a snapsh
I am running Plone-2.1.1. I recently upgraded from zope-2.8.3 to zope-2.8.4
with no apparent issues. However, today when I attempted to view the
properties of the Document content type within portal_types, i.e. I used a
URL ending with /portal_types/Document/manage_propertiesForm. I received
the fo
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 1820
Blamelist: efge
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Zope-Dev mail
Chris Withers wrote at 2005-11-24 19:34 +:
> ...
>and I firmly agree with, that zodb
>conflicts should _not_ sublcass exception.
-1
>That way, there's less chance
>of them being caught by inexperienced programmers putting in try: except
>Exception: 's.
Most people that use an unrestricted
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2005-11-25 11:22 +0100:
> ...
>Guess what, I know that. But I want a "real" ConflictError, to see what
>useful info about involved objects I can log.
The only thing you need to log is "str(conflict_error_value)".
"ConflictError" does a good job to provide all available
Chris Withers wrote at 2005-11-24 19:42 +:
> ...
>I would really appreciate it if you could dig this out and give me a
>direct url. If you do, I promise I will see it gets properly merged into
>the Zope core...
You know that I *never* search for others (I hate searching).
But I can show you
On Nov 25, 2005, at 2:25 PM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
2005/11/24, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Interestingly, you can raise things that don't subclass Exception in
python. This was discussed before, and I firmly agree with, that zodb
conflicts should _not_ sublcass exception. That way, ther
2005/11/24, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Interestingly, you can raise things that don't subclass Exception in
> python. This was discussed before, and I firmly agree with, that zodb
> conflicts should _not_ sublcass exception. That way, there's less chance
> of them being caught by inexper
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 1818
Blamelist: anguenot,chrisw,efge,jinty,sidnei,yuppie
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
_
I've made changes so that Five and (Zope 2.9 & Zope 2 trunk) send
IContainerModifiedEvents when appropriate. These events are new in
Zope 3.2, and subclass IObjectModifiedEvents.
This is of course available in Five 1.2 and Five 1.3.
I still have to stich in a snapshot of Five 1.3 into Zope 2
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Hello,
Benji recently changed test.py in Z3 in order to avoid collision name
with the standard python 'test' module.
I bumped into the same problem running tests under Z 2.8.
I would like to add this change as well in Z 2.8 bin/test.py if no one
objects.
oups, tipo, (Z2
Hello,
Benji recently changed test.py in Z3 in order to avoid collision name
with the standard python 'test' module.
I bumped into the same problem running tests under Z 2.8.
I would like to add this change as well in Z 2.8 bin/test.py if no one
objects.
Tarek
--
Tarek Ziadé | Nuxeo R&D (P
Chris Withers wrote:
Fred Drake wrote:
On 11/23/05, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Basically, I'd like to create a site once, and use it for all
subsequent tests, until I made a change that means the site needs to
be recreated. But how? Well, I'm not sure. How, for example, could
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:22:32AM +0100, Florent Guillaume wrote:
| Guess what, I know that. But I want a "real" ConflictError, to see what
| useful info about involved objects I can log.
I'm pretty sure there are ZODB tests that exercise the creation and
handling of ConflictError.
--
Sidnei d
Chris Withers wrote:
If nothing is logged, I'll add something at level ERROR.
Has this been done? If not, I volunteer to do it as part of my upcoming
"make COnflictErrors suck less" work ;-)
I'm working on it at the moment.
BTW does someone have a handy script to provoke conflict errors on
Hi All,
Chris McDonough wrote:
Is this the number of log messages that indicate a conflict error
occurred (e.g. "x conflict errors since DATE" messages in the event
log) or the number of conflict errors that are retried more than three
times and thus make it "out" to the app user? I'm gues
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I'm actually not sure what's logged when a Conflict Error makes it back
to the users, offhand I don't see anything in my logs. Can someone
confirm or infirm that fact?
Well, I can agree based on empirical evidence. I have MailingLogger
(sorry, I really feel the need
Fred Drake wrote:
On 11/23/05, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Basically, I'd like to create a site once, and use it for all
subsequent tests, until I made a change that means the site needs to
be recreated. But how? Well, I'm not sure. How, for example, could I
Jim's "new test run
Dieter Maurer wrote:
What is this telling me?
It is incredibly stupid.
So I'm gathering...
The message above only tells you, that (at the given time)
a request for "/some_uri" resulted in a "ConflictError"
and that since startup (at the given time) 347 conflicts occured.
Unfortunately, it
20 matches
Mail list logo
