[Philipp von Weitershausen]
> ...
> Therefore, just to reduce confusion, I would move Makefile.in and
> configure.py to the root (and remove the decoys). I'd also suggest we
> rename 'inst' to 'installer' so that it won't be confused with
> "instance". Then again, this is just me and my weird sense
AFAIK the default configuration used by tests does not have a dbtab.
See lib/python/App/config.py.
Stefan
On Jan 14, 2006, at 16:45, Florent Guillaume wrote:
I'll look at it.
Florent
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This failure is tie up with Florent's re
On 1/15/06, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I'm not following this. The installer never offers to create a
> user (although it does ask you to supply a password for the fixed
> "admin" user). So you must be talking about something else, but I
> don't know what. For example, when l
Dieter Maurer schrieb:
> Tino Wildenhain wrote at 2006-1-13 16:45 +0100:
>
>>...
>>Maybe just have new uZPT with Unicode and leave the "old" ZPT allone?
>>Maybe with limited ability to "add" old ZPT from ZMI or such.
>>
>>This would solve the backward-compatibility problems and would be a more
>>s
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sat Jan 14 12:01:02 2006 UTC to Sun Jan 15 12:01:02 2006 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Unit Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED : Zope-2_9-branch Python-2.4.2 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sat Jan 14 21:10:40 EST 2
Brian Sutherland wrote:
> Since we are close to the release, I felt compelled to ask before I did
> this. Could I revert 39890 [1] for the 3.2 release?
>
> It seems that phillip finished zpkg's module support some time ago [2].
>
> (I ask as this is causing me headaches doing the Debian packaging
