There will be a Zope + Friends sprint @ PyCon 2009, to work on Zope
and Zope-related technologies like Grok, Repoze, Deliverence etc.
http://us.pycon.org/2009/sprints/projects/zope/
Because of the Repoze overlap with WSGI based frameworks we plan to
work closely together with the WSGI/Pylons/Tu
Andreas Jung wrote:
> See this thread:
>
> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-web/2009-January/thread.html
Shame, oh well, I think dictatorship is the way to go and I think you'd
make a pretty good dictator, so go for it :-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
Fred Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> BTW, I strongly discourage from imports. (I didn't always have this
>> opinion, but have seen the error of my ways. Thanks to Fred Drake for
>> nudging me in this direction.) IMO, this is wildly more important than
>> any o
Hey Andreas.. yay, thank you for taking this on. I'd like to help
however I can.
You asked about write access on wiki.zope.org - assuming you mean zope
manager access, I've added an account for you, see private mail. (For
the record, other manager accounts on wiki.zope.org at this time are:
ba
I'm with Tres on both issues: +1 for PEP-8 import grouping (sorted
alphabetically within each group), -1 for repeating
english.adjective.fully english.adverb.qualified english.noun.package
english.noun.names all over the place in the code (this also ties
with my preference of trying to keep all my
On Feb 19, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> - -1. I prefer the PEP8 grouping, where "stdlib" imports are
> separated
> from "dependecy" imports, which are separated from "local" imports.
> Note that this is *not* subjective (an import is unambiguously in
> exaclty one of those three clas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19.02.2009 19:16 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
>> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org.
>
> Is this failure official or is there
Andreas Jung wrote:
> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org.
Is this failure official or is there just no action on this?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
On Feb 19, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Exactly . As I mentioned in the previous post, sorting is the *key*
>> here. [Pun intended].
>> Grouping (python, zope., myapp. modules order), or non-grouping,
>> becomes a non-issue when imports are sorted.
>>
>> +1
>
> - -1. I prefer the PEP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org. The
goal is having up some pages with the downloads, basic pointers and
links with the final release of Z
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> I sort my imports. Period. This makes from imports come before
>> regular imports (because f comes before i). I discourage from
>> imports, so this isn't much of an issue fo
On Feb 19, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> I sort my imports. Period. This makes from imports come before
> regular imports (because f comes before i). I discourage from
> imports, so this isn't much of an issue for me except for old code.
> Having imports sorted takes very little effort a
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> BTW, I strongly discourage from imports. (I didn't always have this
> opinion, but have seen the error of my ways. Thanks to Fred Drake for
> nudging me in this direction.) IMO, this is wildly more important than
> any of the issues raised in t
On Feb 19, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while gathering, cleaning and consolidating the various statements
> that
> float around about the coding style for Zope 3, I found a couple of
> issues that I'd like to get clarification for.
>
> What I found is currently gathered
> Which attribute naming is current?
> ==
>
> Do we use under_scores or mixedCaseNames?
>
> I think I remember that we decided to follow PEP 8 for new code and
> invoke the "local consistentency" rule on old code. Is that correct?
According to this document in Zope3
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> and the decision that was apparently adopted is in this document
> (section titled "Coding style"):
>
> http://svn.zope.org/*checkout*/Sandbox/philikon/foundation/maintaining-soft
>ware.txt
Except that not all people agreed to that, includi
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Christian Theune wrote:
> Which attribute naming is current?
> ==
>
> Do we use under_scores or mixedCaseNames?
>
> I think I remember that we decided to follow PEP 8 for new code and
> invoke the "local consistentency" rule on old code.
On Feb 19, 2009, at 5:13 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Christian Theune wrote:
>> Which attribute naming is current?
>> ==
>>
>> Do we use under_scores or mixedCaseNames?
>>
>> I think I remember that we decided to follow PEP 8 for new code and
>> invoke t
On Feb 19, 2009, at 2:07 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>
> I have the impression that you're talking past each other.
>
> There are two ways of using OpenID:
>
> * you can be an OpenID provider, i.e. accept logins with username &
>password and respond to authentication requests from other websit
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Feb 18 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Feb 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Feb 18 20:59:4
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while gathering, cleaning and consolidating the various statements that
> float around about the coding style for Zope 3, I found a couple of
> issues that I'd like to get clarification for.
>
> What I found is currently gathered at
> http://svn.zope.o
Hi,
while gathering, cleaning and consolidating the various statements that
float around about the coding style for Zope 3, I found a couple of
issues that I'd like to get clarification for.
What I found is currently gathered at
http://svn.zope.org/zope3docs/source/codingstyle/python-style.rst?re
Hello,
On http://svn.zope.org/zc.selenium/branches/wosc-zope2/
I've worked to make zc.selenium be usable in Zope2/Five.
There are two big changes, apart from having to sprinkle some
try/except imports and other small compatibility bits around:
1. Since Zope2 insists quite firmly on running in its
23 matches
Mail list logo
