Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Thomas Lotze wrote:
>> I wonder: should we start requiring that the object passed to setSite()
>> implement (or even be adaptable to) IPossibleSite?
>
> I think the simplest way forward would be not to change the semantics as
> part of this step.
Agreed.
--
Thomas
_
I had a "rethinking interfaces" talk accepted. It's about the
positives and negatives of zope.interface and zope.component, driven
primarily from the perspective and experience of the Launchpad team,
and myself in particular; and about changes that might be made or
differences we are inter
On Nov 3, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
...
>> It is an advocacy piece only in the sense that we are saying that,
>> by-and-large, we like what the packages give us, but it is more
>> challenging than that. It's an interesting pairing to Jeff Shell's
>> in
On Nov 3, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> 2009/11/3 Gary Poster :
>> I had a "rethinking interfaces" talk accepted. It's about the
>> positives and negatives of zope.interface and zope.component, driven
>> primarily from the perspective and experience of the Launchpad team,
>> and mys
Chris McDonough wrote:
> So were any Zope talks/tutorials accepted?
I have no idea, besides BFG, which is at the very least Zope related. :)
Lennart?
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/
So were any Zope talks/tutorials accepted?
FWIW, Tres had a BFG talk accepted, and Carlos had a BFG talk and a BFG
tutorial accepted. I proposed a talk about profiling that didn't make it.
The TG guys had one talk accepted.
Not sure about Pylons.
I assume Django had a bunch, but I don't know
I also proposed a Grok tutorial, but I've had no word about its
acceptance or declination. My zope talk where I would discuss Grok,
buildout and zope.component was rejected.
Carlos de la Guardia
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> So were any Zope talks/tutorials accepted?
>
2009/11/3 Gary Poster :
> I had a "rethinking interfaces" talk accepted. It's about the
> positives and negatives of zope.interface and zope.component, driven
> primarily from the perspective and experience of the Launchpad team,
> and myself in particular; and about changes that might be made or
Thomas Lotze wrote:
> Thomas Lotze wrote:
>
>> While writing tests for the zope.site.hooks module I'm moving to
>> zope.component, I notice that the module calls getSiteManager() on an site
>> object. Such an object isn't technically required to implement an
>> interface that declares that method,
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Nov 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Nov 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Mon Nov 2 20:39:13 EST 2009
URL: http://
Hello Christian,
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
> [...] btw: do you log the seed if
> you generated one?)
Yep, the seed is displayed at the end of tests, so that it can be
reused to reproduce a failing test.
$ ./bin/test --shuffle -cvvv
Running tests at level 1
On 10/19/2009 11:57 AM, Jonathan Ballet wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> as I mentioned by Sebastien, the patch has been commited into the
> sdouche-shuffle branch. It now has tests and a bit of documentation
> too.
>
> Regarding CLI arguments, I'm not sure this could be changed like
> Christian propose
FWIW, Martijn is correct. Python 2.4 does not like values > 2**31-1
for list indexes, slices, e.a. even on 64 bit systems. I have disabled
the respective test runs.
Stefan
On 01.11.2009, at 14:43, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> 2009/10/31 Tres Seaver :
>> I can't reproduce this failure when runni
13 matches
Mail list logo
