+1 with Tres' position.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
> > Jim Fulton wrote:
> >> On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> >>
> >>> Simon Michael wrote:
> -1, Gary's is clearer.
>
> Toc, toc. Is there anybody home?
I'll test it for you alsolet you know how it goes.
Andrew Sawyers
>
> On 2/23/07, Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Someone volunteered to test and upload the Zope Installer for Windows
>> when one was ready. I be
ir approach.
To quote a blog I'd read earlier today: Doing little things well is a
step towards doing big things better.
Allowing others to assist in refining the little technologies which make
up Zope 3 can achieve this goal. I would fear this would be impossible
if the first vision was fol
This has been my approach also. Not surprisingly, many of us worked on
these processes together and have 'sanitized them' over time. :) There
has always been 'another side' who either hasn't liked this procedure or
the 'make' voodoo and have come up with their own, or just haven't had
to do this
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:47 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> I'll note, FWIW, that we don't do installs from Zope 3 checkouts.
> I think it's worth asking whether this is an important requirement.
> If it is, then we should make it work. Question is, is it worth
> delaying the release? I don't know
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 15:45 +0100, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> So I propose another little change: have the error_log copy to event.log be
> the default behaviour. Today the default is off.
>
> Florent
>
+1
A
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 23:00 +0100, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> 1. Do you want these ConflictErrors retried logs to be at level:
> - INFO
INFO
> - BLATHER
> - DEBUG
> - not logged
> - other
>
> 2. In addition, please specify if you feel those retried
> ConflictErrors should have their full traceba
On 11/24/05 8:54 AM, "Chris McDonough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 24, 2005, at 8:37 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> I recall a slightly different discussion I was involved in. I
>> remember Zope 2 core developers worrying about the inclusion of
>> Five in Zope 2.8; they were worried they
Did you bump up the thread stack size for the python you're running Zope
with? This sounds like that problem. If you search zope.org for FreeBSD -
I have a note on how I fix it.
Andrew
--
Zope Managed Hosting
Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
(540) 361-1700
> -Original Message-
> Fr
I just bumped this up to 20MBs.
Andrew
--
Zope Managed Hosting
Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
(540) 361-1700
> Hi Christian,
> just tried it and got an error too: 'The request or reply is too large.'
> (Upload size is more than 15MB)
>
> Michael
>
> --
> http://zope.org/Members/d2m
> http
What happened? Too large of a file? I can up it for you otherwise, let me
know and I'll check into it.
Andrew
--
Zope Managed Hosting
Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
(540) 361-1700
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Christian The
Chris Withers wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Where?
#zope-dev on irc.zope.org
That should probably be irc.freenode.net.
irc.zope.org is just a cname pointing to irc.freenode.net
Andrew
--
Zope Corporation
Software Engineer
(540) 361-1700
___
Zope-Dev mail
Ken Manheimer wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Ken Manheimer wrote:
What proportion of the list traffic comes from valid members who are
posting from alternate accounts?
A huge percentage was - I don't know how much is making it through to
the lists though. I'm hea
server has went from 2 -3 to ~.5 on
the server in the last hour.
Andrew
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Ken Manheimer wrote:
I noticed this when it went initially went by, but didn't have time
to follow up. The upshot is that there is absolutely no way *under
the current arra
Ken Manheimer wrote:
I noticed this when it went initially went by, but didn't have time to
follow up. The upshot is that there is absolutely no way *under the
current arrangement* that this is going to happen. I can see a way to
swing it, requiring earnest volunteer effort. Here are the deta
test
--
Zope Corporation
Software Engineer
(540) 361-1700
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-anno
What would zodb-dev members like?
[...]
+1
I propose this policy extends to all ZC managed community lists.
Andrew Sawyers
--
Zope Corporation
Software Engineer
(540) 361-1700
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/lis
e the old system was not being managed by us, I do not have
any details as to what/why that might have happened, so if you find
youself resubscribed now we appologize. This should not continue to
happen and if anyone experiences further problems please let us know ASAP.
Thank You,
Andrew Sa
ext week. If anyone has questions, feel free to let us know.
Thanks,
Andrew Sawyers
--
Zope Corporation
Software Engineer
(540) 361-1700
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross po
Jim Fulton wrote:
The first question is:
Is it a problem to have two packages with names differing only in case?
+1
A response with a positive sign (e.g. +1, +0, +2, ...) indicates
agreement that this is a probelm. :)
Jim
Andrew
--
Zope Corporation
Software Engineer
(540) 361-1700
___
I don't know about 'blessing', but I'm using it on a project currently
(Python 2.3 and Zope 2.6.2) without glitches.
Andrew
Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Friday 03 October 2003 15:33, Chris McDonough wrote:
Jim is keen to get an audit going quickly before a 2.7
final release, and the audit would b
21 matches
Mail list logo
