Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Nuxeo, with the kind help of the Zope team of Chalmers
University, plans to organise a Zope 3 sprint on April 3-7 in our
premises in Paris.
I'm afraid we'll have to change the dates, to accomodate for several
schedule contraints (including room availability).
So
Geoff Davis wrote:
I think that the idea of giving Zed its own, distinct identity is great.
I think it is stupid.
We (Zope Corp + the Zope Community) have spent 8 years building the Zope
brand, and you want to restart from scratch ?
S.
--
Stéfane Fermigier, Tel: +33 (0)6 63 04 12 77
Geoff Davis wrote:
Yes, and the use of the new name Z or Zed is a way to emphasize that
the Zed library is NOT a big, monolithic app server; rather, it's
something new and cool.
Zope 3 is new and cool.
Or at least, let's spin it this way.
Screencasts, podcasts, 14'59 wikis (quicker than
Strange how (most of) the Plone people seem to be so quick in willing to
sacrifice the Zope brand :(
S.
--
Stéfane Fermigier, Tel: +33 (0)6 63 04 12 77 (mobile).
Nuxeo Collaborative Portal Server: http://www.nuxeo.com/cps
Gestion de contenu web / portail collaboratif / groupware / open
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 07:39, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I know I sound conservative here, but I'm actually happy with the way
things are working now. Let's not fix what isn't broken. We can make
incremental steps to making it better, and I'm glad people are
Max M wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
Zope 2 is complicated! It has too many layers of everything.
Layers are good, when they reliably hide complexity.
The reason for Zope 3 is to make it simpler for developers.
Yep. 14'30'' wikis and such.
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Andrew Milton wrote:
+---[ Stephan Richter ]--
| Hello everyone,
|
| With the development of Zope 3, the Zope developers committed to a new
| development process and higher software quality guidelines. With the
adoption
| of Zope 3
Stephan Richter wrote:
(2) I fear that the ZSCP would be talked to death and stay dead. My experience
in the Open Source world has shown that if something does not have
practicality, it dies unless someone is getting paid. I am certainly not
getting paid for this. By biggest interest here is
I have made a little update on the Zope article on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zope
Here is the diff:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zopediff=36787848oldid=36094466
It would probably be very helpful if some knowledgeable people would
also take some time to review the
Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
for next release we plan to replace several parts with the corresponding
components from Zope 3 (e.g. ZPT´). Philipp is working on a proposal on
that issue. In addition I would like to get rid of some old stuff that
is no longer maintained and buggy:
-
Chris McDonough wrote:
I'm looking for opinions here..
The progenitor of Eggs (Phillip Eby) suggests that this is too
implicit. He suggests instead that people who install packages should
use a program which implicitly installs packages. The major difference
between this and what
Fred Drake wrote:
On 12/22/05, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jar files have no dependencies.
Well, I know you know what you mean here, but I'll elaborate since the
kids haven't started fighting yet this morning. :-)
Jar files don't have dependency metadata. They're pretty
I have added support for coverage analysis using coverage.py from Gareth Rees
and Ned Batchelder, as well as support for profiling using either the profile or
hotshot modules from the Python standard library, to Zope 2's test runner test.py.
Justification:
- coverage.py will let you
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 10:20:28AM +0200, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
| I have added support for coverage analysis using coverage.py from Gareth
| Rees and Ned Batchelder, as well as support for profiling using either the
| profile or hotshot modules from the Python
Florent Guillaume wrote:
They use buggy eval() in their XMLRPC code, which of course causes
massive security problems, notably with RSS...
http://www.gulftech.org/?node=researcharticle_id=00088-07022005
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/07/04/
Has my message been rejected (from zope-dev) or not ?
I'm confused.
S.
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Paul Everitt wrote:
Other foundations approach things a bit differently. (I did quite a
bit of research on this for the Plone Foundation.)
Eric has done some research recently
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
I hope we will be able to discuss this further next week, but also that
these discussions will be able to procede with the technical side of
things during the sprint next week.
s/with/alongside/
Sorry for my poor english.
Remember that some of us are not native
Testing CPSCore: make: *** [test] Error 1 (
handlers.handleConfig(opts.configroot, opts.confighandlers))
Here is the full log:
--
Loading Zope, please stand by ...Traceback (most recent call last):
File runalltests.py,
Hi,
just came across the litmus WebDAV compliance testing tool on
www.webdav.org, and ran it on zope 2.5.0. Here's the result:
- running `basic':
0. init.. pass
1. begin. pass
2. options... pass
3. put_get... pass
4.
In article 003601c182e1$78ec9e70$3e28011c@rag2,
Dirk Datzert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
after applying the patch zope won't restart correclty for my version.
(python 2.1.1, zope 2.4.3)
Traceback:
2001-12-12T07:45:49 PANIC(300) z2 Startup exception
Traceback (innermost last):
File z2.py,
Hi,
I've sent this message yesterday to the EuroZope list but got not
conclusive answer:
The eurozope.org Zope instance was down again this morning due to the
same recurring problem as last week:
2001-10-18T02:32:52 ERROR(200) ZServer uncaptured python exception,
closing channel
It seems to me that when I create a CatalogAware objet in a version,
it doesn't get into the catalog after the version is committed (in fact,
it doesn't event get into the catalog inside the version).
Am I right? Is this considered normal behavio(u)r? Any idea for a workaround?
Regards,
Hi,
a developer who's working with me has been bitten by the following fact
today, one year after me.
There are two methods on objects BasicUser.
One is called has_role and has the following docstring:
Check to see if a user has a given role or roles.
The other one is called hasRole, is an
Hi,
please try this as a DTML Method:
dtml-let l=[[1, 2], [3, 4]]
dtml-in l
dtml-var _['sequence-item']br
/dtml-in
/dtml-let
dtml-let l=[(1, 2), (3, 4)]
dtml-in l
dtml-var _['sequence-item']br
/dtml-in
/dtml-let
Why should the two results differ ?
S.
--
Stéfane
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:16:57PM +0100, Steve Alexander wrote:
If you look throughthe zope-dev list archives, you'll find a number of
arguments on each side as to whether this is a bug or a feature.
Thanks. I definitely call that a bug.
S.
--
Stéfane Fermigier, Tel: +33 (0)6
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 12:00:08PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "Dario Lopez-Ksten" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Zope-dev] Using Java (or JDBC) with Zope/Python
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:09:39 +0100
Organization: CITES
charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello!
I am exploring the
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:00:07PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Toby Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: James Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Zope-dev] SessionManager, BerkeleyDB, and license compatability
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:04:28
Message: 2
From: Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Zope-dev] unit testing framework proposal
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 14:10:14 -0400
Please see
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/UnitTestingFramework for a
propsal for
28 matches
Mail list logo
