Stephan Richter wrote:
Can you be more specific? I think ZCML is very compact.
Well, I'm hoping to take a proper look at the latest Z3 "some time
soon", so I'll let you know after that and shut up on the subject in the
meantime ;-)
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Anyway, while I have my criticisms of ZCML, too much typing is really
not very important in my list. You can get it somewhat shorter, I'm
sure, but not *that* much shorter. I'd worry more about the reading part
than the writing.
More typing = more reading in my books, so I
Lennart Regebro wrote:
[snip]
For me, the main drawback with ZCML is that WingIDE doesn't to auto
completion on it. ;) An ZCML editor that automatically popped up a
list of the supported keywords for every statement would be really
nice. :-p
Actually emacs + nxml + the Relax NG schema (unfortunatel
On Apr 8, 2005 3:09 PM, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 08 April 2005 07:34, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> > For me, the main drawback with ZCML is that WingIDE doesn't to auto
> > completion on it. ;) An ZCML editor that automatically popped up a
> > list of the supported keyword
On Friday 08 April 2005 07:34, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> For me, the main drawback with ZCML is that WingIDE doesn't to auto
> completion on it. ;) An ZCML editor that automatically popped up a
> list of the supported keywords for every statement would be really
> nice. :-p:
Yeah, I talked to Steph
On Friday 08 April 2005 03:24, Chris Withers wrote:
> Yes, this is all stuff I know and love about Z3 ;-);-) When I last saw
> ZCML, it was horrible though. I don't mind XML, just not if it lots of
> pointless typing...
Can you be more specific? I think ZCML is very compact.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Apr 8, 2005 12:54 PM, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
A benefit of using an XML format is that many editors will happily
both do syntax high-lighting, some sort of auto-indentation, and
automatic commenting/uncommenting. A non-standard syntax wouldn't do
tha
On Apr 8, 2005 12:54 PM, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
> > Lennart Regebro wrote:
> >
> >> You know the feeling when a third party product has the wrong
> >> permission or no permission at all on something? What are you gonna
> >> do? Subclass: Lots of work. Patc
Chris Withers wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
You know the feeling when a third party product has the wrong
permission or no permission at all on something? What are you gonna
do? Subclass: Lots of work. Patch: You gotta keep it updated. With
ZCML, you override it. TADA!
Yes, this is all stuff I kno
Lennart Regebro wrote:
You know the feeling when a third party product has the wrong
permission or no permission at all on something? What are you gonna
do? Subclass: Lots of work. Patch: You gotta keep it updated. With
ZCML, you override it. TADA!
Yes, this is all stuff I know and love about Z3 ;-
Richard Jones wrote:
> Is this a general trend for Zope 2? I'd rather see Zope 2 kinda avoid ZCML if
> possible. It's just one of those personal preference things, I suppose, but I
> know I'm not the only one who isn't that enamored of the ZCML approach.
ZCML started out for me (and as an experinc
Chris Withers wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
Is this a general trend for Zope 2? I'd rather see Zope 2 kinda avoid
ZCML if possible. It's just one of those personal preference things, I
suppose, but I know I'm not the only one who isn't that enamored of
the ZCML approach. I actually like having the
Richard Jones wrote:
Is this a general trend for Zope 2? I'd rather see Zope 2 kinda avoid ZCML if
possible. It's just one of those personal preference things, I suppose, but I
know I'm not the only one who isn't that enamored of the ZCML approach. I
actually like having the declarations all in
13 matches
Mail list logo
