Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-08 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Martijn Pietersm...@zopatista.com wrote: The following checkin fixed this particular problem:  http://svn.zope.org/Acquisition/trunk/src/Acquisition/_Acquisition.c?rev=102564view=rev The acquisition slice wrapper accepted Py_ssize_t arguments, but then passed

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-08 Thread Andreas Jung
On 08.08.09 14:19, Hanno Schlichting wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Martijn Pietersm...@zopatista.com wrote: The following checkin fixed this particular problem: http://svn.zope.org/Acquisition/trunk/src/Acquisition/_Acquisition.c?rev=102564view=rev The acquisition slice

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-08 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 13:19, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote: One thing to note here is that the above change is indeed only of of probably many that need to be made to support 64-bit platforms properly. The other thing to note is that the change now introduces a hard requirement on

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-07 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 08:04, Martijn Pieters m...@zopatista.com wrote:  AssertionError: Incorrect Content-Length is set! Expected 20425,     got 20426. I don't grok the range support code at all:  probably Martijn Pieters is the only person in the world who does.  The tests are quite

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-07 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 14:55, Martijn Pieters m...@zopatista.com wrote: Here is the simple test case: from Acquisition import Implicit class Root(Implicit):    pass class Slicer(Implicit):    def __getslice__(self, start, end):        return [start, end] root = Root() slicer =

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-07 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 14:55, Martijn Pieters m...@zopatista.com wrote: The problem is caused by an acquisition wrapped object with a __getslice__ method get the wrong indices passed in when the end parameter is ommitted:  data[start:] Image.Pdata classes have a __getslice__ method, and

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-03 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 18:40, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:   File /home/tseaver/projects/Zope-trunk/src/OFS/tests/testRanges.py,     line 332, in testMultipleRangesBigFileOutOfOrder     (7, 80001)])   File /home/tseaver/projects/Zope-trunk/src/OFS/tests/testRanges.py,    

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-03 Thread Andreas Jung
On 03.08.09 09:04, Martijn Pieters wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 18:40, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: File /home/tseaver/projects/Zope-trunk/src/OFS/tests/testRanges.py, line 332, in testMultipleRangesBigFileOutOfOrder (7, 80001)]) File

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-02 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Jung wrote: On 25.07.09 13:57, Hanno Schlichting wrote: At this point I think we need to declare 64-bit platforms as unsupported. Hopefully people with the right kind of knowledge would like to step up and start working on these issues.

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-02 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote: I think I have fixed the ExtensionClass and Acquisition problems for 64-bit machines:  I released new eggs to PyPI for them: Awesome! You wouldn't be interested to look at the C code in Persistence and Zope2 itself? ;-)

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-02 Thread Andreas Jung
On 02.08.09 20:30, Tres Seaver wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: On 25.07.09 13:57, Hanno Schlichting wrote: At this point I think we need to declare 64-bit platforms as unsupported. Hopefully people with the right kind of knowledge would like to step up and start working on these issues. This

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-02 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hanno Schlichting wrote: On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote: I think I have fixed the ExtensionClass and Acquisition problems for 64-bit machines: I released new eggs to PyPI for them: Awesome! You

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-08-01 Thread Andreas Jung
On 25.07.09 13:57, Hanno Schlichting wrote: At this point I think we need to declare 64-bit platforms as unsupported. Hopefully people with the right kind of knowledge would like to step up and start working on these issues. This is really not an option. Zope 2.12 must run on 32 and 64 bit

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-07-27 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 02:55:58AM +0200, Hanno Schlichting wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Shane Hathawaysh...@hathawaymix.org wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: I kind of suspect that we are seeing the results of http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0353 though. That is very

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-07-25 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Stefan H. Holekste...@epy.co.at wrote: All failures appear to be due to the new box running Linux x86_64. Tests still pass fine on the Mac. Any experience with this? MemoryError in Acquisition? WTH? I don't have any experience with either 64-bit nor can I

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-07-25 Thread Shane Hathaway
Hanno Schlichting wrote: I kind of suspect that we are seeing the results of http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0353 though. That is very likely. BTW, that PEP links to a handy tool that reveals most 64 bit portability issues in Python-oriented C code. From what I understand we need to

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-07-25 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Shane Hathawaysh...@hathawaymix.org wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: I kind of suspect that we are seeing the results of http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0353 though. That is very likely.  BTW, that PEP links to a handy tool that reveals most 64 bit

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-07-23 Thread Andreas Jung
I can reproduce the failures in ExtensionClass and also get some weird errors while trying to buildout the Acquisition package: aj...@blackmoon:/develop/repository/svn.zope.org/Acquisition/trunk bin/buildout Develop: '/data/develop/repository/svn.zope.org/Acquisition/trunk/.' Unused options for

Re: [Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-07-21 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan H. Holek wrote: All failures appear to be due to the new box running Linux x86_64. Tests still pass fine on the Mac. Any experience with this? MemoryError in Acquisition? WTH? I can reproduce the OFS.tests.testRange failures on my

[Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

2009-07-18 Thread Stefan H. Holek
All failures appear to be due to the new box running Linux x86_64. Tests still pass fine on the Mac. Any experience with this? MemoryError in Acquisition? WTH? Stefan On 18.07.2009, at 14:00, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Jul 17