Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-12-02 Thread Paul Everitt
Joachim Werner wrote: > I think that there ARE problems that can not be solved on a mailing list or > in the fishbowl. One of them is doing a good general design (which we MIGHT > need for some of the Zope 3.0 issues). I followed all the stuff about the > CMF and formerly PTK and knew that it was

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Joachim Werner
> When we first opened the fishbowl, it was with the certainty that we > wouldn't get it right immediately. That's why we went with the intentially > low-tech approach of a pile of Wikis. That first step actually worked > pretty well for a while until we hit critical-Wiki-mass and there were > sud

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Joachim Werner
> IMO, Bugzilla won't fix these kinds of problems. I think the first step > is to refine what we have while finding better ways to work together. We definitely need a ZOPE-based approach. What I really don't get is this: We all seem to be building Zope-based systems for communities, public adm

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Paul Everitt
Brian Lloyd wrote: [snip] > When we first opened the fishbowl, it was with the certainty that we > wouldn't get it right immediately. That's why we went with the > intentially low-tech approach of a pile of Wikis. That first step > actually worked pretty well for a while until we hit > cri

Re: SV: [Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Paul Everitt
Magnus Heino wrote: >>This is just a guess, but I suspect that this is a sort of unfortunate >>cycle developing: people post proposals, get (understandably) dismayed >>at the response time and end up not spending much time there, either >>contributing or providing feedback. >> > > Well, lets

SV: [Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Magnus Heino
> This is just a guess, but I suspect that this is a sort of unfortunate > cycle developing: people post proposals, get (understandably) dismayed > at the response time and end up not spending much time there, either > contributing or providing feedback. Well, lets move this discussion to a w

SV: SV: [Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Magnus Heino
> > Well, that checkin was done to the cvs 4 days ago. If you haven't > > read the one line at dev.zope.org about it being available in the > > cvs, or if you dont subscribe to the cvs mailinglist, how are you > > supposed to know that it exists? :-P > > Actually, he sent an email to zope-dev

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Chris Withers
Brian Lloyd wrote: > spot on ;-) > - The fishbowl needs to be integrated with email in order to stay on > people's radar. Hallelujah! > - There needs to be a way to "filter the firehose" so that people on > all sides can focus on the things they care about. Praise be! > - The

RE: [Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Brian Lloyd
> It's been mentioning that ZC doesn't pay attention, so proposals go in > and nothing happens. Bugzilla won't fix that problem. I'll add that > the community doesn't always pay good enough attention. Sure, people > will say "when will we have versioning" or "when will we have web > service

Re: SV: [Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Paul Everitt
Magnus Heino wrote: > Well, that checkin was done to the cvs 4 days ago. If you haven't > read the one line at dev.zope.org about it being available in the > cvs, or if you dont subscribe to the cvs mailinglist, how are you > supposed to know that it exists? :-P Actually, he sent an email to

SV: [Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Magnus Heino
> This isn't a good track record. Brian produced 35 pages worth of > almost-flawless docs on web services to go with his code. But no > comments. And he's doing this on his own time. So let's remember that > this is a two-way street. Well, that checkin was done to the cvs 4 days ago. If you

[Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Lennart Regebro
From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 1. We can build something better. I can list requirements but that's not relevent here. However, this will take serious > effort (it's a hard problem...) and as we know from bitter experience, things that need serious effort either don't > happen, take

[Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl?

2001-11-30 Thread Paul Everitt
Chris Withers wrote: > Paul Everitt wrote: > >>Moral: there's a difference between correct and right. While we might >>have good reasons for inattention, it will surely lead to an >>unsatisfying conclusion. Thus, ZC needs to be smaller part of a larger >>Zope, IMO, and do this by spending more

[Zope-dev] Re: Fishbowl not problem centered enough

2001-06-20 Thread Simon Michael
Ken Manheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > WikiForNow project. As soon as i'm clear form a current project i > *may* be able to concentrate on at least formulating a reasonable > quick-and-dirty way to do notifications, and getting it done for the Hey Ken - since you used the magic words quick-