Hi,
On 04/09/2010 07:38 PM, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote:
It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how to
write the code which tests that.
See my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Drake wrote:
Log message for revision 110702:
correct metadata: I really did write this.
Setting the ZF as maintainer appears sufficient to appease the policy
checker.
Hmm, that doesn't work for me:
$ svn co $ZSVN/ZConfig/trunk
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how
to write the code which tests that.
See my later follow-up as well.
In particular, while it *may* be reasonable to set the ZF as
maintainer, it's
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake fdr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the *right* thing to do is update the copyrights to reflect
the copyright ownership, but not to otherwise change package metadata.
+1
--
Benji York
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how to
write the code which tests that.
See my later follow-up as well.
In particular, while it
