At 06:13 10/05/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>'else' is tricky within the block oriented structure of anything XML-ish,
>because of the concept of 'well-formedness'. The 'if' statement would have
>to be singly wrapped, and the else block wrapped separately, looking at
>least somewhat awkward any
Tim Hoffman wrote:
>
>
> This I would imagine could introduce all sorts of nasty bugs.
Good points! On that basis, I retract my feature request ;-)
cheers,
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/z
Jim Penny wrote:
>
> on the surface, to be pretty ugly. I have said that there are three
> specific things I dislike about ZPT -- 0) lots of things have changed
> spelling again -- request v. REQUEST, here v. context v. container v.
> this v. ?
Yeah, there was absolutely no need for this and
Tim Hoffman wrote:
>
> The big problem with the whole 'else' issue as I see
> it, is that non coders, using dreamweaver etc.. would no doubt end
> up with both bit's of html in their template.
But that's exactly what you want! hey can then see what would happen in either case and
will probabyl w
I'm not using it, and will never use it, so why does Zope 2.5.1 always
create one for me?
Grrr. Highly annoying. >:-[
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding!
On Thursday 09 May 2002 09:47, Chris Withers wrote:
> Thomas Olsen wrote:
> > DTML is great for style sheets, javascript and such where you cannot use
> > ZPT and python scripts would be too ugly to use ;-)
>
> There's no reason to use DTML for these, as I've explained before ;-)
>
Must have miss
On Friday 10 May 2002 01:19, Adrian Hungate wrote:
> Yeah, for CSS I'd use ZStyleSheets, and for javascript I'd use a very large
> magnet... but that is another argument.
--
Regards,
Thomas Olsen
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Olsen wrote:
>
> Must have missed that mail..?
http://zope.nipltd.com/public/lists/dev-archive.nsf/$$Search?OpenForm
cheers,
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts
Quoting "Jeffrey P Shell":
> The 'not' TALES namespace is valuable. The downside is that you
> evaluate the expression twice. A good way to work within this is
> something that I did earlier today, outside of this conversation,
> where I evaluate an expression earlier and assign it to a
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> I'm not using it, and will never use it, so why does Zope 2.5.1 always
> create one for me?
> Grrr. Highly annoying. >:-[
From Zope 2.1.3 (when I started Zopeing), I could write a Python
Product that expected standard_html_header and standard_html_footer to
exist.
Fr
From: "Steve Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From Zope 2.5.1, I can write a Python Product that expects
> standard_template.pt to exist.
I dont see the purpose of that. Checking that is exists is trivial if you
need it.
I don't. I want to get rid of it, thankyouverymuch.
Guess I'll just have t
If its the same as earlier zopes its line 174 of OFS\Application.py remove
the offending reserved names. Except maybe for Control_Panel, it seems
pointless. If the item's not there, an error is raised. Simple. To me there
should just be a warning message, "Removing this item may cause some
product
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:53:47AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
> Jim Penny wrote:
> >
> > on the surface, to be pretty ugly. I have said that there are three
> > specific things I dislike about ZPT -- 0) lots of things have changed
> > spelling again -- request v. REQUEST, here v. context v. co
I looked at 2.5 on surprised to see that apart from Control Panel only
'browser_id_manager' and 'temp_folder' are protected meaning you can delete
all the others. I threw a monkeypatch up that allows you to delete them
anyway, and it will work for pre 2.4 systems
(http://www.zope.org/Members/andym
on 5/10/02 12:47 AM, Jeffrey P Shell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] scrivened:
>
> You would need something to close off the 'if' statement, otherwise, a
> document full of 'if' statements and no 'else' ones could fill up a stack
> needlessly.
What's so bad about that? The stack wouldn't carry over afte
on 5/9/02 11:58 PM, Tim Hoffman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] scrivened:
> The big problem with the whole 'else' issue as I see
> it, is that non coders, using dreamweaver etc.. would no doubt end
> up with both bit's of html in their template.
>
Don't you have that now with the kludgey 'not' construct
Jim Penny wrote:
>
> > ...can also be written as:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Interesting. I seem to remember this from the Wiki's, is it documented
> anywhere else? This really seems like Chapter 5 material.
No idea, but it definitely should be...
> > >define="species fish/sp
Marc Lindahl wrote:
>
> Don't you have that now with the kludgey 'not' construct?
What is kludgey about the 'not:' construct?!
cheers,
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross po
On 5/10/02 4:53 AM, "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Penny wrote:
>>
>> on the surface, to be pretty ugly. I have said that there are three
>> specific things I dislike about ZPT -- 0) lots of things have changed
>> spelling again -- request v. REQUEST, here v. context v. conta
Jim Penny wrote:
> I have also said that, while ZPT is not as warty as DTML, ZPT looks,
> on the surface, to be pretty ugly. I have said that there are three
> specific things I dislike about ZPT -- 0) lots of things have changed
> spelling again -- request v. REQUEST, here v. context v. contain
On 5/10/02 9:25 AM, "Marc Lindahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 5/10/02 12:47 AM, Jeffrey P Shell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] scrivened:
>
>>
>> You would need something to close off the 'if' statement, otherwise, a
>> document full of 'if' statements and no 'else' ones could fill up a stack
>> nee
From: "Marc Lindahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > You would need something to close off the 'if' statement, otherwise, a
> > document full of 'if' statements and no 'else' ones could fill up a
stack
> > needlessly.
>
> What's so bad about that? The stack wouldn't carry over after
> or - couldn't pr
Don Hopkins wrote:
> From: "Marc Lindahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>>You would need something to close off the 'if' statement, otherwise, a
>>>document full of 'if' statements and no 'else' ones could fill up a
>>
> stack
>
>>>needlessly.
>>
>>What's so bad about that? The stack wouldn't carry ov
Hello,
I would like to setup the security on a Zope server such that a user can
edit permissions on something they own, but not grant more permissions
than what they have acquired from the parent.
If a user owns a folder they could grant "Owner" any permissions
they want inside of that folder (A
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 12:21, Jim Penny wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:53:47AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Actually, the first time I got bit was on repeat v. condition. I wanted
> the condition to test each row, not to guard the entire iteration
> process.
You shouldn't want
25 matches
Mail list logo
