Re: [Zope-dev] Zope and Python compatibility

2003-01-14 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Monday 13 January 2003 7:46 pm, Casey Duncan wrote: > I personally feel like Zope should run on 2.2.x whether required or not. > Requiring 2.2.x does have the advantage of limiting the possible blessed > configurations on which Zope will run, thereby making development, support > and bug fixing

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6.0 ZMI Problem for CJK(Collector 623) patch.

2003-01-14 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Saturday 21 December 2002 10:54 pm, Kazuya FUKAMACHI wrote: > I applied Toby's patch + Yousei's patch, and it works. > > Thanks to your neat piece of work, > I can start to work on Zope 2.6.0 now, and go farther. I am currently looking at getting this into 2.6.1 or 2.6.2. I would appreciate c

Re: [Zope-dev] Rendering of objects in DTML

2003-01-14 Thread Chris Withers
Bjorn Stabell wrote: I would like ... to call different functions. The first renders the object, the second returns a mapping of the content's attributes/properties, the third checks for "trueness" of the content. Rendering a content could be an expensive operation and I don't want to

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope and Python compatibility

2003-01-14 Thread Guido van Rossum
> On Monday 13 January 2003 7:46 pm, Casey Duncan wrote: > > > I personally feel like Zope should run on 2.2.x whether required or not. > > Requiring 2.2.x does have the advantage of limiting the possible blessed > > configurations on which Zope will run, thereby making development, support > > an

RE: [Zope-dev] Rendering of objects in DTML

2003-01-14 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 01:01, Bjorn Stabell wrote: > > Bjorn Stabell wrote: > > I would like > > > ... > > > to call different functions. The first renders the object, the second > returns a mapping of the content's attributes/properties, the third > checks for "trueness" of the content.

[Zope-dev] attaching images and wav file to email

2003-01-14 Thread Mark Hendricks
I am trying to attach images and other binary data to an email. The text attachment works fine. (I would like to hide the following label(s) if possible... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="my.ip.501.473.1042563430.436.4336") Following the dtml documents is the mail I g

[Zope-dev] ACL patch for zope 2.6

2003-01-14 Thread Erik Dahl
I wanted to add a little more security to a zope site that has no firewall in front of it but is mostly for internal users. To do this I put a check in the accept callback of http_server. Not sure how much security increase this really gives but I wonder if anyone would find it useful (or if anyo

[Zope-dev] Zope and Python compatibility for 2.7: decision

2003-01-14 Thread Brian Lloyd
Hi all - There has been some discussion lately regarding whether or not the next Zope feature release (2.7) should require Python 2.2.2 or not. For background, this is something that was already on the project plan, with the idea being that it would be easier to backport interesting things fro

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6.0 ZMI Problem for CJK(Collector 623) patch.

2003-01-14 Thread Kazuya FUKAMACHI
Hi, Toby Thank you for following the issue. On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:33:40 + Toby Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 21 December 2002 10:54 pm, Kazuya FUKAMACHI wrote: > > > I applied Toby's patch + Yousei's patch, and it works. > > > > Thanks to your neat piece of work, > > I

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6.0 ZMI Problem for CJK(Collector 623) patch.

2003-01-14 Thread Yusei Tahara
Hi. > I am currently looking at getting this into 2.6.1 or 2.6.2. I would > appreciate confirmation that you are all happy with this combination > of patches. Thank you:-) BTW, I was asked for upload my patch on collector. Could you put it in a issue 737 page? I don't permit to upload it. Regar

RE: [Zope-dev] Rendering of objects in DTML

2003-01-14 Thread Bjorn Stabell
Thanks Leo, this is very helpful. It should probably be in a HOWTO somewhere. :) > -Original Message- > From: Leonardo Rochael Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 01:01, Bjorn Stabell wrote: > > > Bjorn Stabell wrote: > > > > I would like > > > > > > ...