On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 02:07:58PM +0200, Malthe Borch wrote:
> Some motivation:
>
>
> File ".../zope/interface/adapter.py", line 482, in queryMultiAdapter
> result = factory(*objects)
> TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 2 arguments (3 given)
>
> Perhaps the need for introspection too
Hi again.
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I kept my promise and added the simple tests for the first two issues I
found while doing testing against Plone.
I have meanwhile fixed the first trivial issue (conflicting argument
called 'instance') and added a simple test for the second one.
Now after a
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 17:37 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
> The other option whould be to split every widget into it's own
> package and use z3c.widget as namespace package.
>
> What do you think?
i think we should split z3c.schema and z3c.widget to separate packages,
so we can have one namespace
Hi,
the IPrincipalDeleted event is never notified. As a matter of fact,
this would be useful to be able to trigger some cleanup in various
plugins,
when user data has to be cleaned up.
(FYI the PrincipalCreated event has a nice high level API _doAddUser
that triggers IPrincipalCreated but no high
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Apr 15 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Apr 16 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Apr 15 20:58:06 EDT 2008
URL: http://m
On 2008-04-16 10:01:30 +0200, Nikolay Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 17:37 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
The other option whould be to split every widget into it's own
package and use z3c.widget as namespace package.
What do you think?
i think we should split z3c.schema
Thanks for looking into this, Hanno! Here's my feedback:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I kept my promise and added the simple tests for the first two issues
I found while doing testing against Plone.
I have meanwhile fixed the first trivial issue (conflicting argument
cal
Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> ViewPageTemplateFile etc. are only meant to be used as class attributes,
> never as instance attributes. This statement is also true for the
> current, acquisition-based one from Five.
Is that documented anywhere? I can't seem to find any interface o
Which package is emitting the Download error: unknown url type: svn --
Some packages may not be found! Its quite annoying and I have been
seeing it crop up in a few builds. Anyone else seeing this. Many thanks.
Regards,
David
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
ViewPageTemplateFile etc. are only meant to be used as class attributes,
never as instance attributes. This statement is also true for the
current, acquisition-based one from Five.
Is that documented anywhere? I can't seem to
The ``constraints`` module in zope.app.container seem to be usable
outside a ZODB-application---ditto most of the interfaces.
If we want to support a nozodb-environment, it would be nice to not have
to pull in ZODB just to get these frameworky definitions.
Is it package overkill to move these
Hi David
> Betreff: [Zope-dev] Annoying: Download error: unknown url
> type: svn -- Some packages may not be found!
>
> Which package is emitting the Download error: unknown url
> type: svn -- Some packages may not be found! Its quite
> annoying and I have been seeing it crop up in a few buil
Hi Roger. I turned on debug and increased verbosity. z3c.template and
z3c.form seem to be the culprits. Getting 4 of these warnings on
z3c.template and 1 with z3c.form between the getting ... and picked ...
notices. Not quite sure why they are emitting the warnings. Can't find
the error in buil
On Apr 16, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi David
Betreff: [Zope-dev] Annoying: Download error: unknown url
type: svn -- Some packages may not be found!
I'm against using subversion URLs in buildouts.
Be that as it may
Which package is emitting the Download error: unknown ur
On 2008-04-16 18:34:44 +0200, Malthe Borch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
The ``constraints`` module in zope.app.container seem to be usable
outside a ZODB-application---ditto most of the interfaces.
If we want to support a nozodb-environment, it would be nice to not
have to pull in ZODB just to g
On 16.04.2008, at 18:34, Malthe Borch wrote:
The ``constraints`` module in zope.app.container seem to be usable
outside a ZODB-application---ditto most of the interfaces.
If we want to support a nozodb-environment, it would be nice to not
have to pull in ZODB just to get these frameworky de
16 matches
Mail list logo
