[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 6 OK

2010-03-09 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Mar 8 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Tue Mar 9 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Mar 8 20:36:56 EST 2010 URL: http://

[Zope-dev] Agenda for today's IRC meeting (3pm UTC on #zope)

2010-03-09 Thread Christian Theune
(gmane seems to be stuck, so maybe this ends up being send twice...) Hi, continuing the experiment of weekly meetings, here's the reminder for today's meeting including the proposed agenda. Time and place is, again, 3pm UTC at #z...@freenode. If you'd like to review last week's summary, please

[Zope-dev] Optional C extensions

2010-03-09 Thread Baiju M
Hi, Any idea how difficult it is to create optional C extensions for these packages: zope.container zope.hookable zope.proxy zope.security I think for all other packages in ZTK has optional C extensions: http://wiki.zope.org/bluebream/StatusOfWindowsBinaryPackages Regards, Baiju M __

Re: [Zope-dev] Optional C extensions

2010-03-09 Thread Fred Drake
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Baiju M wrote: >    Any idea how difficult it is to create optional C extensions > for these packages: zope.proxy will be fairly difficult to implement without C. Alternate Python implementations may be able to use extensions written in other ways, however. (Jav

Re: [Zope-dev] Optional C extensions

2010-03-09 Thread Attila Oláh
Hi, You might want to try peak.utils.proxies [1] as an alternative for zope.proxy. With some modifications it worked for me on Google App Engine with most (but not all) of the the functionality needed by zope.location. Also this link [2] may (or may not) be a good starting point if you would like

Re: [Zope-dev] Optional C extensions

2010-03-09 Thread Jim Fulton
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Baiju M wrote: > Hi, > Any idea how difficult it is to create optional C extensions > for these packages: > > zope.container > zope.hookable > zope.proxy > zope.security I believe it is very hard, if not impossible, for zope.proxy and zope.security. I suspect t

[Zope-dev] z3c.form - ComputedErrorViewMessage and crazy adapter behaviour

2010-03-09 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi, I posted about this earlier, but the message seems to have gotten lost in the ether. I am trying and struggling to use ComputedErrorViewMessage. So far, I've discovered two problems, one which affects IValue adapters in general. 1. The last discriminator of a ComputedErrorViewMessage (and

[Zope-dev] Agenda for today's IRC meeting (3pm UTC on #zope)

2010-03-09 Thread Christian Theune
Agenda for today's IRC meeting at 3pm UTC on #zope Hi, continuing the experiment of weekly meetings, here's the reminder for today's meeting including the proposed agenda. Time and place is, again, 3pm UTC at #z...@freenode. If you'd like to review last week's summary, please check here: https:

[Zope-dev] z3c.form - ComputedErrorViewMessage

2010-03-09 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi, I'm struggling to get custom ComputedErrorViewMessage adapters to work in z3c.form. I'm still debugging, but I came across this: In error.py: ErrorViewMessage = value.StaticValueCreator( discriminators = ('error', 'request', 'widget', 'field', 'form', 'content') ) ComputedErr

Re: [Zope-dev] Agenda for today's IRC meeting (3pm UTC on #zope)

2010-03-09 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Christian Theune wrote: > Agenda > -- > >  - Can we ensure building Windows binaries? We talked about the status of this a bit. I just finished checking the list of packages with C extensions as listed at http://wiki.zope.org/bluebream/StatusOfWindowsBinar

Re: [Zope-dev] Optional C extensions

2010-03-09 Thread Tim Hoffman
Hi As Attila pointed out, zope.proxy is possible to implement using peak.util.proxies if you only want some limited zope.proxy support. You won't get zope.security going down this path. I do that specifically so that I can use zope.deferredimport on app engine. Below is the awful hacking I do t

Re: [Zope-dev] Agenda for today's IRC meeting (3pm UTC on #zope)

2010-03-09 Thread Baiju M
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > We talked about the status of this a bit. I just finished checking the > list of packages with C extensions as listed at > http://wiki.zope.org/bluebream/StatusOfWindowsBinaryPackages > > The listed packages currently match the list of pa