Hey all -
Boy, it's been a long time since I've hung around here. Anyway, I think
we've found a bug somewhere in the zope transaction machinery. Every
now and then, a backend will get into 'idle in transaction' state. After
that, no work on that backend ever commits - the 'END' query just never
g
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 08:55:56PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Ross J. Reedstrom writes:
> > Boy, it's been a long time since I've hung around here. Anyway, I think
> > we've found a bug somewhere in the zope transaction machinery.
> A really long time ago s
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:12:31PM -0600, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 08:55:56PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> > Ross J. Reedstrom writes:
> > > Boy, it's been a long time since I've hung around here. Anyway, I think
> > > we
Thank you Kapil! This solved the problem I was having with any
PostgreSQL ZDA and the exUserFolder product: now everthing works
correctly.
Ross
P.S. The URL should be (note the extra 's'):
http://www.zope.org/Members/k_vertigo/ShortStories/Transactions/
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 05:17:18AM -0
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 12:07:12PM -0500, Adam Manock wrote:
>
> >Interesting. One complication with that scheme is that ther is no
> >convenient place to put caching. If it goes between Pen and Zope, you
> >need many instances of your cache. If it goes between Pen and the
> >clients, Pen's clien
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:02:22AM -0500, Eron Lloyd wrote:
> Very interesting. I think I've read about this somewhere before. The
> claim of "4x faster than PostgreSQL" raised my brow. It is true that
> Gadfly is becoming quite stale, and only supports a *very* limited
> subset of SQL. It also wo
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 06:45:10AM -0400, Andreas Jung wrote:
> Don't use 2.1.3 because Zope 2.3 is not supported to run under Python 2.X.
> Use Python 1.5.2 instead.
>
> -aj
>
> P.S. and take care with the use of digitial IDs. E.g. Outlook Express
> refused to reply to this message without vali
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:55:40AM +, Chris Withers wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
> >FWIW, the reason that there is a flurry of activity before any release
> >is because people want to see features in a stable release version and
> >by nature (IMHO) programmers are procrastinators. ;-)
>
> T
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:16:04AM -0800, Andy McKay wrote:
> Yes. Where are you located? I was thinking of organizing a west coast US
> sprint...
According to this email (about a month ago:
http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2002-November/017898.html )
He's in Southwestern Mississippi, wh
Same problem has been reported with Oracle 8.1, since it too will return
duplicate names. The SQL92 spec is a bit ambiguous about whether all
returned column names must be unique.
Ross
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 01:09:13PM -0500, Adam Manock wrote:
>
> specifically with:
>
> SELECT W1.city, W1.tem
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:25:27PM -0500, Casey Duncan wrote:
> The semantics of Zope's database functionality is such that duplicate column
> names are not (and probably never will be) possible in the same result set.
> This is because Zope expects to access columns by name rather than position.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:31:32PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> On 04/15/2010 11:27 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > On 2010-4-15 17:59, Christian Theune wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> here's the minutes. As I've been adventurous, I'll add a few comments:
> >>
> >> * I've started diving into the matt
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:55:43AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
> Constructive criticism and feedback is welcome _now_.
>
What's your target client browser versions? It renders fine in Chrome
8.0 and firefox 3.6.17 (on linux), but 3.0.6 renders the
portal-siteactions at the top of the blue bar,
13 matches
Mail list logo
