--On 29. Oktober 2006 10:06:42 +0100 yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oops! Sorry! I did not mean to cause any confusion:
- AFAICT the 2.10 branch points already to the 3.3.0 tag.
Right.
However Philipp pointed out that the Zope 2 trunk uses the Zope 3 trunk
right now. I pointed the
Hi!
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 29. Oktober 2006 10:06:42 +0100 yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oops! Sorry! I did not mean to cause any confusion:
- AFAICT the 2.10 branch points already to the 3.3.0 tag.
Right.
However Philipp pointed out that the Zope 2 trunk uses the Zope 3 trunk
yuppie wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Mon Oct 23 21:35:18 EDT 2006
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2006-October/006371.html
First, thanks for resuming this collected
--On 28. Oktober 2006 23:50:36 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OMG, why are we using the 3.3 branch HEAD on the 2.10 branch??? This is
how Stephan's fix got pulled into Zope 2 automatically and *automatically
broke* Zope 2. It also broke Five trunk for some reason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Mon Oct 23 21:35:18 EDT 2006
URL:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Mon Oct 23 21:35:18 EDT 2006
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2006-October/006371.html
First, thanks for resuming this collected report. I
