From: "Shane Hathaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well, I'm not so enthusiastic about it. Implicit acquisition in URLs
> leads to subtle bugs. One thing that just about every Zope site does is
> "acquire" images using a simple relative URL, but that makes the images
> much less cacheable.
Not if yo
Adrian Hungate wrote:
>
> Bottom line, internal bugs to one side, Z2.x works a particular way, and is
> documented as doing so. This is a powerful and useful feature, and we are
> likely to severly impact the power and process of "Zopeing" by removing it.
> If we are still heading for "10x" we sh
bro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Wei He" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Zope logic
The namspace traversal in Zope 2 severely violates the principle of least
surprise IMO. Although you can use this to
.co.uk
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Toby Dickenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Lennart Regebro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Wei He" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 4:07 PM
> Su
://www.haqa.co.uk
- Original Message -
From: "Toby Dickenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lennart Regebro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Wei He" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev]
Toby Dickenson wrote:
>
> My conclusions are:
>
> a. implicit acquisition is dangerous
>
> b. acquisition that searches outside the containment hierarchy is evil.
>
>
> Im not keeping up with Zope 3 development. how does Zope 3 handle
> acquisition?
There is no implicit acquisition in Z
On Thursday 30 May 2002 10:29 am, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> It not only sounds good, but it is good.No, it' is fantastic. Amazing.
> Totally unbelivingly great! It's one of the best and main features of Zope.
Is anyone relying on your site to provide information? How do you test your
site to mak
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> From: "Wei He" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>An object (say index_html) is inherited by child objects of the site say
>>Document to make http://www.domain.com/Document share the upper
>>level index_html. This sounds good but acutally not I think.
>
>
> It not only sounds good
From: "Wei He" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An object (say index_html) is inherited by child objects of the site say
> Document to make http://www.domain.com/Document share the upper
> level index_html. This sounds good but acutally not I think.
It not only sounds good, but it is good.No, it' is fantast
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Chris Withers wrote:
> > People will be really confused to see such results:
> >
> > http://www.zope.org/Documentation/ZopeBook/Documentation
> > http://www.zope.org/Images
>
> Why would they see such URLs?
Normally would not. But if I know such a site is managed by Zope,
Hi,
Wei He wrote:
>
> An object (say index_html) is inherited by child objects of the site say
> Document to make http://www.domain.com/Document share the upper
> level index_html. This sounds good but acutally not I think.
So do a lot of other people, but not for your reasons ;-)
> People wil
Hi all,
I have tried Zope for a week and found a logic problem.
An object (say index_html) is inherited by child objects of the site say
Document to make http://www.domain.com/Document share the upper
level index_html. This sounds good but acutally not I think.
People will be really confused
12 matches
Mail list logo
