Hi,
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:28 -0500, Benji York wrote:
> [... -vvv ...]
> I wonder if the best possible world might be one in which setup.py
> versions are overridable by buildout's version section. That would seem
> to give people both options.
>
> In fact, that sounds really appealing to me
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:43 AM, Benji York wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Stripping all versions from the dependencies in setup.py only works if
>>> users are willin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Poster wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:43 AM, Benji York wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Stripping all versions from the dependencies in setup.py only works
>>> if
>>> users are will
On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:43 AM, Benji York wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Stripping all versions from the dependencies in setup.py only works
>> if
>> users are willing to run their own package indexes, and figure out
>> edge
>> cases suc
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stripping all versions from the dependencies in setup.py only works if
> users are willing to run their own package indexes, and figure out edge
> cases such as the ones you describe by themselves:
The above claim appears f
On 2008-12-08 18:23:33 +0100, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Benji York wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benji York wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at
On Dec 8, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Benji York wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benji York wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Christ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benji York wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Christian Zagrodnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
Log message for
On Monday 08 December 2008, Benji York wrote:
> Nope, the tests will pass in the zope.testbrowser buildout.
>
> However, if a testbrowser user for some reason run the testbrowser tests
> outside of its buildout, then you're right, they may see a failure if
> their versions aren't new enough. At th
On Dec 8, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Benji York wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benji York wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Christian Zagrodnick
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
Log message f
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benji York wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Christian Zagrodnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Log message for revision 93722:
>>> - Switched to Zope 3.4 KGS.
>>>
>>> - New lin
On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benji York wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Christian Zagrodnick
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Log message for revision 93722:
>> - Switched to Zope 3.4 KGS.
>>
>> - New lines are no longer stripped in XML and HTML code contained
>> in a
>> textarea; r
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Christian Zagrodnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Log message for revision 93722:
> - Switched to Zope 3.4 KGS.
>
> - New lines are no longer stripped in XML and HTML code contained in a
>textarea; requires ClientForm >= 0.2.10 (LP #268139).
This revision mak
13 matches
Mail list logo
