Florent Guillaume wrote:
[snip]
Martijn asked important question:
> If we backport Zope 3 events, what package will they live in?
> How will this relate to Five? What other packages does this draw in
> (zope.interface definitely)? Etc.
If we want that to work with Five and Zope 2.7, will there b
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2004-12-10 19:02 +0100:
The two options we have are quite different:
The model in Products/Event and Products/EventListenerTool is geared
toward local definition of listeners and rules for dispatch (if needed,
the tool could easily be divorced
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2004-12-10 19:02 +0100:
>
>The two options we have are quite different:
>
>The model in Products/Event and Products/EventListenerTool is geared
>toward local definition of listeners and rules for dispatch (if needed,
>the tool could easily be divorced from CMF by t
[Keeping only zope-dev, not zope-cmf]
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I'd like to revive this discussion about having events in the core.
Sidnei even mentionned getting them in Zope directly,
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/IncludeEventsInCore
I'm all for it, and would r
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I'd like to revive this discussion about having events in the core.
Sidnei even mentionned getting them in Zope directly,
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/IncludeEventsInCore
I'm all for it, and would really help many people.
It would be awesome if a minimal impl
Andreas Jung wrote:
Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to revive this discussion about having events in the core.
Sidnei even mentionned getting them in Zope directly,
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/IncludeEventsInCore
I'm all for it, and would really help many peopl
--On Montag, 6. Dezember 2004 18:32 Uhr +0100 Florent Guillaume
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to revive this discussion about having events in the core.
Sidnei even mentionned getting them in Zope directly,
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/IncludeEventsInCore
I'm all for it, and