On Apr 4, 2005 4:53 PM, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unix-heads certainly want it anyway; Windows-heads aren't used to
> anything better than the Windows services API, so they don't even
> bring it up.
Well, it's not so much as API, but the fact that Windows people are
used to starting
...
[Christian Theune]
>> d) I have no idea about zopectl on windows. Is there some knowledge
>>around on this?
[Mark Hammond]
> I recall a message from Tim saying it has never worked and probably never
> will.
Well, everything that builds on zdaemon is Unix-specific -- the
underlying machi
[Christian Theune]
...
> I have a compiled Zope 2.8a2 around here, but I'm not able to run the
> unit tests on it and I'm not willing to publish it therefore because I
> have the suspicion that this branch never has seen windows before except
> the one pass of unit tests before 2.8a1.
FYI, I usual
Hi,
Am Montag, den 04.04.2005, 21:12 +1000 schrieb Mark Hammond:
> > d) I have no idea about zopectl on windows. Is there some knowledge
> >around on this?
>
> I recall a message from Tim saying it has never worked and probably never
> will. IIUC correctly, its functionality isn't as desired
> b): I can either create branches for WinBuilders responding
> to the Zope
> Versions. Or (what I like better) I can put the WinBuilders
> somewhere in the Zope 2 tree to allow versioning along a branch
> automatically so continuous tests know where to get the
> WinBuilders from.
