Hey,
Roger Ineichen wrote:
I think there is a little confusion about which package depends on
each other.
Right now there is a zmi.core package this package should
contain core parts without to much dependency. After that
we need several zmi.* packages which are replacements for
each
Hi,
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:40:51 +0200
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Or should we break BBB and let people know that they have to install
zmi.core for zmi support? (I think so)
I won't break BBB as much as possible, at least I'd like to keep persistent
data
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:48:40 +0200
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Hey,
Roger Ineichen wrote:
I think there is a little confusion about which package depends on
each other.
Right now there is a zmi.core package this package should
contain core parts without to
Hey,
Yusei TAHARA wrote:
[snip]
BTW, what do you think of zope.app.form? As far as I know, it has some
basic interfaces like IInputWidget and IDisplayWidget, and they are used
by various packages. Then I don't see any reason to leave them under
zope.app.form. So, I think maybe we could also
Hi Martijn
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] People in the Zope 3 and ZMI teams
Hey,
Roger Ineichen wrote:
I think there is a little confusion about which package depends on
each other.
Right now there is a zmi.core package this package should
contain core
parts without to much
Hi Roger,
Thank you very much for your comment, and sorry for my late reply.
I did not receive your post I don't know why...
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] People in the Zope 3 and ZMI teams
Hi,
I just start working on maintaining ZMI and make it optional package.
For now, it is easy
Yusei TAHARA wrote:
[snip]
Should the old zope.app.* package depend on the new zmi.core package?
(I think not)
No. But zmi.core might depend on zope.app.* packages.
I think this should be avoided if we can. The idea is to lose the
dependency of the zope.app.* packages for the ZMI, after
, very slow.
But that's another part and could probably done after
finishing the zmi refactoring part.
Regards
Roger Ineichen
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] People in the Zope 3 and ZMI teams
Yusei TAHARA wrote:
[snip]
Should the old zope.app.* package depend on the new
zmi.core package?
(I
Hi
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] People in the Zope 3 and ZMI teams
Hi,
I just start working on maintaining ZMI and make it optional package.
For now, it is easy to participate, just porting zope.app.*
(I already list up targets as directories in zmi.core) and
make sure that existing tests
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:09:05 +0200
Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
To be honest, zope3 (as it is today) is a nice platform for me and for my
company to build web applications (and, in general, the ZCA is a nice
platform for building not-only-web applications), and it would be a
Hi,
I just start working on maintaining ZMI and make it optional package.
For now, it is easy to participate, just porting zope.app.*
(I already list up targets as directories in zmi.core) and make sure
that existing tests succeeds.
Best regards,
--
Yusei TAHARA yu...@domen.cx
Hi
From: zope-dev-boun...@zope.org [mailto:zope-dev-boun...@zope.org] On Behalf
To be honest, zope3 (as it is today) is a nice platform for me and for my
company to build web applications (and, in general, the ZCA is a nice
platform for building not-only-web applications), and it would be a
Hello there,
* 2009-04-16 09:44, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Just so we don't lose track of who are interested in maintaining Zope 3
(and/or the ZMI). I've distilled the following list of people who are
interested in helping maintain Zope 3. This might mean making sure
existing apps work,
Hey Fabio,
Thanks again for coming back on this, this is quite encouraging.
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
I've just checked out that the domain zope3.org is not owned by the Zope
Corporation. Do you have any idea about it? Would it be possible to claim
it back?
I don't know, unfortunately.
I'm
14 matches
Mail list logo
