-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Benji York wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Baiju M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It looks like today they ch
On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Baiju M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It looks like today they changed their licence to GPL v3 !
I don't know if that exclamation mark is of joy or
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Baiju M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like today they changed their licence to GPL v3 !
I don't know if that exclamation mark is of joy or woe. I vote for woe.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
It looks like today they changed their licence to GPL v3 !
Regards,
Baiju M
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailm
Regarding Ext's licensing, I'm told that they are planning to switch
to an OSI-approved license in the near future; we're still waiting for
more details, but my source is here:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/opencore/lists/opencore-dev/archive/2008/04/1208546123405
- PW
--
Paul Winkler
htt
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > can you elaborate with a few more sentences
> > > why?
> > >
> >
> > I could, but I'd rather not. I suggest reading:
> >
> > http://mjg59.livejournal.com/84586.html
> >
> > if you haven
On Apr 18, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 18 April 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
Because of ExtJS licensing issues, we should not check anything into
the repository that builds on or requires ExtJS in any way.
I assume you got lawyer advice;
No.
can you elaborate with a few
On Friday 18 April 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Because of ExtJS licensing issues, we should not check anything into
> the repository that builds on or requires ExtJS in any way.
I assume you got lawyer advice; can you elaborate with a few more sentences
why? (I did read their license stuff last n
On Apr 18, 2008, at 4:28 AM, Baiju M wrote:
Paul Carduner wrote:
Log message for revision 85449: creating a branch to see what I can
do about extjs integration.
I found Jim removing two of his extjs related libraries from svn due
to license issues (r85246, r85248).
Please make sure that ther
On Apr 18, 2008, at 14:09 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 18 April 2008, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
There is still an ongoing debate about that even - the extjs authors
basically only want to offer LGPL to you if you meet certain criteria
but won't allow you to redistribute it with just standar
On Friday 18 April 2008, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> There is still an ongoing debate about that even - the extjs authors
> basically only want to offer LGPL to you if you meet certain criteria
> but won't allow you to redistribute it with just standard LGPL
> licensing.
I just researched this a lit
Previously Baiju M wrote:
> Since extjs is released under LGPL, I guess you can release the library in a
> similar license, but only ZPL licensed thing can be committed to our svn :(
There is still an ongoing debate about that even - the extjs authors
basically only want to offer LGPL to you if yo
12 matches
Mail list logo
