On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Jim Fulton wrote:
> For a while,
> those of us working on Zope 3 revelled in "refactor mercilessly".
> This was fine before Zope 3 was widely adopted. We have since leaned
> the value of mercy. :)
LOL!
(This should make it into the eternal list of Zope quote
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Chris McDonough wrote:
> zope.tal's buildout.cfg contains:
>
> [versions]
> zope.traversing = 3.4.0
> zope.app.publisher = 3.4.0
>
> zope.tal shouldn't depend on either of these, so I'd like to remove
> both the pinning in buildout.cfg and fix the dependency bug tha
On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
So what makes this stuff work via buildout is all version-pinning
now?
They aren't using the cheeseshop. They are using the KGS instead.
They are currently also pinned.
zope.tal's buildout.cfg contains:
[versions]
zope.traversing = 3.4.0
zope
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Chris McDonough wrote:
> In the meantime, whose feet would I be shooting if I changed setup.py
> dependency info so that, e.g. zope.tales (and the like) didn't pull in
> as many dependencies? Installing zope.tales (as an example, I'm sure
> its as a result of a
On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007, at 6:05 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
- Figure out why buildout can (apparently) qsuccesfully install
depend
On Nov 14, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007, at 6:05 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
- Figure out why buildout can (apparently) qsuccesfully install
dependencies of currently failing zope.* eggs while
On Nov 14, 2007, at 4:46 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
...
The individual eggs typically can't be used
outside of a zope appserver installation (and if they can, they
probably shouldn't be in "zope.app", they should be in "zope" or
they should be their own top-level package
On Nov 14, 2007, at 6:05 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
- Figure out why buildout can (apparently) qsuccesfully install
dependencies of currently failing zope.* eggs while easy_install
can't. I probably won't be able to do
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> > Yes, you lose the
> > ability to make a bugfix in one subpackage and release it, but
> > IIRC the intent is to trim zope.app down anyway, pushing
> > libraryish things out to top-level or zope.* packages.
>
> That *
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> > - Figure out why buildout can (apparently) qsuccesfully install
> > dependencies of currently failing zope.* eggs while easy_install
> > can't. I probably won't be able to do this.
>
> Because most buildouts specifically
10 matches
Mail list logo
