Mark Hammond wrote:
A quick search for "windows" doesn't show too many. As far as I can tell,
all but 2 (1689 and 1728) are fixed with my patches. I also note that my
patches have been sitting there for a number of months now - so I humbly
suggest the problem is not simply a lack of appropriate f
[Mark Hammond]
...
> I understand I could probably gain committer privileges
Send in a contributor form, and that's certain.
> but as mentioned, I wouldn't quite know what to do with them if I
> did
You would use your new powers only for good. If you ran the Zope test
suite before checking in
[Mark Hammond]
...
> * All Zope versions are clearly "broken" (as above) in fundamental (but
> generally the same) ways on Windows, but the status of my patches as
> "features" vs "bugfixes" is unclear - especially given my lack of
> understanding of the culture or the Zope world beyond Plone.
The
* I realize Zope 2.7.x is clearly a "maintenance" branch (from Zope's
POV),
but also a "trunk" branch from the POV of Plone (and therefore from
mine
)
At this point we all know that Zope 2.8 will bring *a lot of changes*.
There might be quite a few people (including the whole Plone community)
w
Andreas:
> | there are several open issues in the Zope collector with
> | Zope running on Windows. I can't see anyone worrying
> | about the Windows platform (I also don't care about
> | Windows as UN*X guy). So if you are interested
> | in running Zope on Windows in a reasonable way than *you*
>
