So..
I was talking to Philipp the other day on IRC, wondering why
http://namespaces.zope.org/zope
Doesn't actually exist on on the intarweb. At first I wondered if it
was a requirement, like for a DTD, and P says no, so I believe him.
We did agree that it would be nice if something lived he
On Sep 25, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
the machine that goes by many names, including svn.zope.org,
cvs.zope.org, and mail.zope.org.
I think I'm right in saying that this poor box does have apache on
it and so might not be such a bad place to stick the foundat
On 9/25/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> Personally, I don't care where www.zope.org is currently located, and
> I also think we should replace it part by part with microsites, like
> wiki.zope.org, bugs.zope.org, news.zope.org, products.zope.org and so
> on,
On 9/25/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Be careful the multiple domain names, it prevents sensible cookie-based
auth. For that reason alone, I'd prefer to see zope.org/wiki,
zope.org/bugs, zope.org/news, etc instead.
Can't you set the cookie for just zope.org? That's what I'm doing
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Perry Smith wrote:
> Wonderful documentation but there are a fair amount of silly typos,
> etc. Do folks want me to open "issues" or "bugs" on these typos?
>
Current ZopeBook version is at http://www.plope.com/Books/2_7Edition
Please check http://www.plope.com/B
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Personally, I don't care where www.zope.org is currently located, and
I also think we should replace it part by part with microsites, like
wiki.zope.org, bugs.zope.org, news.zope.org, products.zope.org and so
on,
Be careful the multiple domain names, it prevents sensible
Jim Fulton wrote:
the machine that goes by many names, including svn.zope.org,
cvs.zope.org, and mail.zope.org.
I think I'm right in saying that this poor box does have apache on it
and so might not be such a bad place to stick the foundation stuff if it
is just flat files?
cheers,
Chris
On 9/25/06, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, this is something Jim actually just proposed as well.
OK, super. Didn't see that.
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/
_
Hi there,
Since we entered this discussion kind of from the side with a not-very
well-titled thread, and we've been making some progress, I figure I
should give a summary of the current status:
* ZC supports the move to community-based hosting.
* it is possible to make both .zope.org and www
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 9/25/06, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately all the pieces "above" Zope, like rewrite setups, are
> out of reach and only accessible by ZC.
Right.
So... A minimum change would be to move name servering to somewhere
controlled by ZF?
Yes, this is
On 9/25/06, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately all the pieces "above" Zope, like rewrite setups, are
> out of reach and only accessible by ZC.
Right.
So... A minimum change would be to move name servering to somewhere
controlled by ZF?
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://w
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
We just need to resurface the svn location of the doc and update if
necessary.
Working on getting it.
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-web maillist - Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web
On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:38 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Sep 2006, at 12:05, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Incidentally I'd like to float the idea of moving zopewiki to (some
> incarnation of) zope.org. Eg put it at zope.org/wiki
> +1 on the idea, it
We just need to resurface the svn location of the doc and update if
necessary.
A
On 9/25/06 11:18 AM, "Martijn Faassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Andrew Sawyers wrote:
>>> This is all documented in subversion IIRC. Jim will know.
>>
>> We need to make sure there a
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
This is all documented in subversion IIRC. Jim will know.
We need to make sure there are people in the foundation (besides Jim and
ZC) who know. I'll ask Jim.
Actually strike out 'foundation' and read 'community' in the line above.
Regards,
Ma
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 9/25/06, Andrew Sawyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The reason it should be done, would be to improve the underlying
hardware. The other reason would be so that the community can
manage all aspects of it's setup. If it's still like it was, then
parts of the architectur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Sep 2006, at 16:10, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
The reason it should be done, would be to improve the underlying
hardware.
The other reason would be so that the community can manage all
aspects of
it's setup. If it's still like it was, then part
On 9/25/06, Andrew Sawyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The reason it should be done, would be to improve the underlying hardware.
The other reason would be so that the community can manage all aspects of
it's setup. If it's still like it was, then parts of the architecture are
not going to be acc
On 9/25/06 10:04 AM, "Lennart Regebro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/25/06, Andrew Sawyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There's a lot more to it then LDAP. LDAP doesn't make it hard
>
> For me it does. That's why I said "somebody that knows it better than me". :-)
>
>> Regardless, it's
On 9/25/06, Andrew Sawyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's a lot more to it then LDAP. LDAP doesn't make it hard
For me it does. That's why I said "somebody that knows it better than me". :-)
Regardless, it's always subjective - and it's not that hard. :)
"Not that hard" sounds like a
There's a lot more to it then LDAP. LDAP doesn't make it hard, it just
makes it harder.
The goal (or lack thereof) will make it hard or trivial. Regardless, I
didn't say rebuilding everything from scratch and sorting out the 'mess'. I
said if it's just resetting up on a different group of server
On 9/25/06, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read what you wrote and I do not think it is trivial.
I agree. I'd guess that for somebody that knows the LDAP software
better than me, it might take a day or two. That's not "trivial". It's
also not "hard". I'd call it ehm, "Not too hard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Sep 2006, at 15:39, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Read what I wrote. :)
I read what you wrote and I do not think it is trivial.
jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFF93tRAx5nvEhZLIRAuViAJ4v8D1spzt/OljuYrIk
Read what I wrote. :)
A
On 9/25/06 8:38 AM, "Jens Vagelpohl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 25 Sep 2006, at 14:31, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
>
>> If it is simply taking what's running and set it up on a new set of
>> servers,
>> it would be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Sep 2006, at 14:31, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
If it is simply taking what's running and set it up on a new set of
servers,
it would be fairly trivial. There's 1 or 2 zeo client servers.
There's a
storage server. There's cvs/svn and mail and
If it is simply taking what's running and set it up on a new set of servers,
it would be fairly trivial. There's 1 or 2 zeo client servers. There's a
storage server. There's cvs/svn and mail and ldap lives some where in that
mix. :) That's about it.
Andrew
On 9/25/06 7:59 AM, "Martijn Faas
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
This is all documented in subversion IIRC. Jim will know.
We need to make sure there are people in the foundation (besides Jim and
ZC) who know. I'll ask Jim.
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-web maillist - Zope-web@zope.org
htt
This is all documented in subversion IIRC. Jim will know.
Andrew
On 9/25/06 6:38 AM, "Jens Vagelpohl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 25 Sep 2006, at 12:05, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>> Incidentally I'd like to float the idea of moving zope
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
[snip]
I don't know what the schedule is for the foundation to start hosting
this, but I'd argue for starting the systems setup from scratch and
adding new settings then.
We don't have a schedule yet. I agree that doing a systems setup with
community-understood component
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Sep 2006, at 12:05, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Incidentally I'd like to float the idea of moving zopewiki to (some
> incarnation of) zope.org. Eg put it at zope.org/wiki
> +1 on the idea, it wouldn't even have to be in the same Zope
instance,
Darryl Cousins wrote:
Hi Martijn,
I'll take a look at the code, to investigate whether we want to maintain
this on svn.zope.org eventually. Are you a svn.zope.org committer, by
any chance?
My signed Zope contributors agreement went in the mail last week.
Great! Faxes to Jim tend to speed u
Hey,
I missed this so I'm very happy Jens cc-ed this onto this list.
> Incidentally I'd like to float the idea of moving zopewiki to (some
> incarnation of) zope.org. Eg put it at zope.org/wiki
> +1 on the idea, it wouldn't even have to be in the same Zope instance,
> rewrite rules can do the s
32 matches
Mail list logo
