On 2/15/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Among other things, yes. The idea isn't mine though, it was Jim's and is
> already in-place as of Zope 3.2/2.9.
Oh, I missed that, I thought it was planned for 3.3. :-)
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Conte
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> I think I agree. This to me makes sense. If it were nameless (are
> there nameless utilities) you could then get off with just component=".alias.sydneyFactory" /> which is then the on/off switch we
> mentioned earlier. And an adapter should be registered the same way
> a
On 2/14/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> component=".alias.sydneyFactory"
> name="alias.SydneyBristow"
> />
>
> The naming of the component already gives it away as a factory. To me that's
> enough naming.
I think I agree. This to me makes sense. If i
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> > Lennart Regebro wrote:
> >
> >>Uhm. -1, actually. I think getting things out of ZCML is a good idea,
> >>but I think this shoots slightly beside the goal. This proposal aims
> >>mostly at getting rid of statements that can be done with o
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> I would like to highlight Lennart's point. We need to be very careful
> here. We would only have an illusion of improvement if we'd end up with
> less directives but more long dotted names into Python packages. I'd
> argue that this might make ZCML *harder* to understand, n
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Uhm. -1, actually. I think getting things out of ZCML is a good idea,
but I think this shoots slightly beside the goal. This proposal aims
mostly at getting rid of statements that can be done with other
statetements, but using more lines.
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 2/13/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
looking for your comments at
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReducingTheAmountOfZCMLDirectives :)
This is a "formal" follow-up on my blog post on ZCML a while back
(http://www.z3lab.org/sections/blogs/ph
On 2/13/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What internals? That a factory is a utility?
What interfaces to use in which case, and how they all map together.
Adding a page with browser:page is trivial. I don't really care that
you can separately define up a whole host of ada
Hi Philipp,
On Monday 13 February 2006 11:08, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> looking for your comments at
> http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReducingTheAmountOfZCMLDirectives :)
>
> This is a "formal" follow-up on my blog post on ZCML a while back
> (http://www.z3lab.org/sections/blogs/philipp-weiter
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 06:08, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> > looking for your comments at
> > http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReducingTheAmountOfZCMLDirectives :)
>
> I am +1 for the proposed directives, in general.
Cool.
> I am waiting for a proposal on the "Potentia
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> I don't think it's about saving lines, but about saving headaches. ;-)
Having to remember how all of the mentioned directives work *does* give me a
headache. I actually remember quite well how the utility and interface
directives work and they are the replacement for most
On Monday 13 February 2006 06:08, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> looking for your comments at
> http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReducingTheAmountOfZCMLDirectives :)
I am +1 for the proposed directives, in general. I am waiting for a proposal
on the "Potential follow-ups" though.
P.S: Please use St
On 2/13/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sometimes not only using more lines, sometimes only using 2 or 3 more lines.
> I'd say whoever wants to save 2 or 3 lines at the expense of indirection is
> misguided.
I don't think it's about saving lines, but about saving headach
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> Uhm. -1, actually. I think getting things out of ZCML is a good idea,
> but I think this shoots slightly beside the goal. This proposal aims
> mostly at getting rid of statements that can be done with other
> statetements, but using more lines.
Sometimes not only using mor
On 2/13/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> looking for your comments at
> http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReducingTheAmountOfZCMLDirectives :)
>
> This is a "formal" follow-up on my blog post on ZCML a while back
> (http://www.z3lab.org/sections/blogs/philipp-weitersha
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Hi all,
looking for your comments at
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReducingTheAmountOfZCMLDirectives :)
+1 for deprecation of the proposed directives.
Also +1 to get rid of 'rdb:gadflyRoot'. I think very few people use
'zope.app.rdb.gadfly' at all since even for
Hi all,
looking for your comments at
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReducingTheAmountOfZCMLDirectives :)
This is a "formal" follow-up on my blog post on ZCML a while back
(http://www.z3lab.org/sections/blogs/philipp-weitershausen/2005_12_14_zcml-needs-to-do-less).
I expect there will be more proposals
17 matches
Mail list logo
